From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8CBCAC5A0 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:50:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:Date:To:Cc:From: Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Iem50jJYwR/hmi6++magwhX1fEYgWmzgZ0K87gHbmao=; b=BhISWyEFr/M70xOm9hSYbbvj2O jMno2S6TL8OMnpYNoiVnmZxXD9w0joTDbLlbxpTyYDrei5XVfl2fO0avkSOXxklyIVkXuRCJfyvIQ idiTwbgR+vHvN1UEKMmtSXIE2TZ+/j//HhvqyQ5ztr58DmRhfHu+Z76XcXqUzSmJiHuCWgjz+8W/Z 8JVxH5a91Zh2vpZxl3YMiefle2k6CZRwL2immRfSDWe9Bq6yo5UfiR0tSUtkvcYpW5++a1F1m32Nk UzaMZ65Rr6K3VQjVjmpTbguHHzJamngGo+z1R4KnF3/tgXdAiLxvizaGqKJVduRBqvodckYbOE+ZV xLiev5OQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uzqUb-00000004pp8-4990; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:50:41 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uzqUa-00000004pov-0NgQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:50:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFFB6013A; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4DD4C4CEEB; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:50:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758347438; bh=Iem50jJYwR/hmi6++magwhX1fEYgWmzgZ0K87gHbmao=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=U9EUZMsqdrtF+r4nqA8DGSHjcJCH+wh37RuQIdT1/D/KSRXUB9B4HrV01MST6tiJa nPmz3xx7S5k0usLpyZVINcf3Fxh+wMUVdtAXtczcn8ru+jbzou/ynEtcw17zu13+5i 8WOwh7T6xPNuUwV+FZnYVTZI/wWdY/6WZyO6qRtW19zFH5mtB9HP9NCy1iXjAN0Dl/ SXTchGXhs12p6Kt5h8dhFV+fSJwdaUJWyEL1+o8go89UF96m++nB//k+E65dNw8+xi PsSjE7lQgazRrPwgn0j0FYiqH9NWXBklwFRZdkm2JhqtU9O6yg6gZTZMJGGY4xfe8w mcSdAhXgJRxAQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20250728070446.949095-1-ping.bai@nxp.com> References: <20250728070446.949095-1-ping.bai@nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: scmi: Add duty cycle ops only when duty cycle is supported From: Stephen Boyd Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev To: Jacky Bai , cristian.marussi@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:50:37 -0700 Message-ID: <175834743791.4354.15798053146130121164@lazor> User-Agent: alot/0.11 X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Jacky Bai (2025-07-28 00:04:46) > For some of the SCMI based platforms, the oem extended config may be > supported, but not for duty cycle purpose. Skip the duty cycle ops if > err return when trying to get duty cycle info. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai > --- Applied to clk-next