From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9ACCCF9E3 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:42:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2XGwFLcaddUPe9z+rlLHiz/mxVsAzIo/OmwVfsvCaD0=; b=Ot2ymBkdEsx0o3qBQLaTsKhtjT 5jJmmARs5MfNDQWnWUlTBNiR8YgdUWn9VAAO5VMksuXmcpgMzamBG8BdNprVw+IG7Tf/H6zG4sB20 aPxQ3KRgkuAEBPqJlkAJjCgibGAuwhB5EVIJ8QcH9YPzvyt5Q/ikzYra6wgmV3wifeWMLKI9RHV/m 4Fp5rkQlXCX1b1AAEczbXFFn9tCgOd1tu6PAAKUhRuRaCBVQDygmjh3YtjnQGfUGsK3tu52k4MfZN 72FL4MzNmfEYqqalfF/TV9CgsnBIW/c+Cp8gyYlRSdY8MpysXtgeyfAqVsWKWcvz3nqeiYauPyHaM FlMjFqlg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIMXQ-00000004uR1-3Zpj; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:42:08 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIMXO-00000004uQl-3mCZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:42:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E03C60142; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20230C116B1; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:41:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762760525; bh=eoQpss3r6FYo/VoSTS5AtWz2fEfHuakzCuCNoTPYihE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=SkY1ybXw4AE6CFT9Tnb2fjXUIAbi+gLXED5B4FtiMQLdokuofcghcxD+xY8/DB3dJ RsFOoMuXNQq3d5SOBbdv5jiaHYA5OLCtdNUvt1z1m1Cfg0fR6V8suAOhTd7pG+PJlt mgyglzWBw2jENzcWsjico9PyLr+Y+XkjC7+xTM9+tplbMS+EV9IAIe56PThbWWCukY 2dSGCF9Ip5CDKH+ldtwdtxsvV8pavZqjVHWAST1KoYe7bzXRRpYAvYCUY/8Y7iMYpx z/6yPHa9cE79YCuAb2g/xvHnjCKsj4bj9ba/mmWaFKT0WkrJS/k1D54JNUOK67LcBG HHreGSjFECDgA== From: Srinivas Kandagatla To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang Cc: Alexandre Torgue , Chen-Yu Tsai , Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Fabrice Gasnier , Gatien Chevallier , imx@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Liu Ying , Mark Brown , Maxime Coquelin , Maxime Ripard , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo In-Reply-To: <20251020060951.30776-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20251020060951.30776-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: treewide: don't check node names Message-Id: <176276050899.18134.7729831344719556570.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:41:48 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:09:49 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Node names are already and properly checked by the core schema. No need > to do it again. > > These are all occurrences I found in linux-next as of 20251015. I did > run dt_bindings_check successfully. I haven't done a way to run > dtbs_check yet because I would need to identify the proper architecture > first, right? Is there some tool which tests all DTs of a certain > binding? At least build bot is happy, I don't know if it checks DTs as > well, though. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [2/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: don't check node names commit: 65c1bc002b27d1ac398e37ce031a45d59999cb13 Best regards, -- Srinivas Kandagatla