From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA5CD6CFAE for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:45:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:Date:To:Cc:From: Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SUqt5//9x6ikkcTBwd39LjEZbg7/SrQDa2wNA7zOQow=; b=ZA3O0ob66ZxxGywZcanpX2r6jX tttoJoOLUKxOxWg/9K95O0YRz7MKOoZ06czJ8kv9YvwM16RssmICrAUR6rsEDx+iSjrRRgC+ZbFP+ kVlJ1YcoXvvh5w4z4hJ6X87KPhbqjEYPzbDr1SGsAWogT6HALl4yvowXs4Wn9AM34raFT93amd8qG WBBZiwGSBe+zbN/zaUNDXmIMXAiLICLtBhwcWPAzB5IZrXYiaEs7nNNQW4d6ukABC0A2NfHbHkqv0 qw4AUjW49UufNcr+HRcnmfV0OcsFpz+j1GHO3+IfbgErUNZOwDKWsODsNDWsQFZxPv5opTbI2PgF8 hdmz4zjg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vj6El-00000007zAz-2Yza; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:45:23 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vj6Ej-00000007z9w-2APT; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:45:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EBB43691; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 080AEC2BC9E; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:45:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769132721; bh=SUqt5//9x6ikkcTBwd39LjEZbg7/SrQDa2wNA7zOQow=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=NhENHPB5ww4MTDz+GSgWQrvVQlmm8vLjHi0m1XU6gUMIwMrOiFWB/NUytwI8IvE+y erSmmJH7L7Lfql6j7XJmDFPyDeYn3JzpHWvuB4dfYDyQH+o9DfvjeQ0KsIzj+NNPs/ Fxd5uY/Db7Wa1UJAfNzSBTJ72mxWKAmH3fJkPgvaCdOKj7oV3atXQjsktQc9NY+zNK aEXJ8jEWshAqH0qVUinuv3uYB/pz0Om+c6zH6l9P9eGPA7E4290y5IWOPKGSUXrOmu h6Sqt0jdb79DqhtwvlFwZcSPil9OrTxoL1huIM7U97FPaDU3weAsHtByXDzCjHECBZ mcaKFBdp8Iurw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20251215-mtk-pll-rpm-v3-2-5afb3191e869@collabora.com> References: <20251215-mtk-pll-rpm-v3-0-5afb3191e869@collabora.com> <20251215-mtk-pll-rpm-v3-2-5afb3191e869@collabora.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 2/5] clk: mediatek: Refactor pll registration to pass device From: Stephen Boyd Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Frattaroli To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chen-Yu Tsai , Chia-I Wu , Dong Aisheng , Laura Nao , Matthias Brugger , Michael Turquette , Nicolas Frattaroli , =?utf-8?q?N=C3=ADcolas?= F. R. A. Prado , Yassine Oudjana Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:45:19 -0700 Message-ID: <176913271924.4027.2857487573564767197@lazor> User-Agent: alot/0.11 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260122_174521_579650_18D09471 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.76 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Nicolas Frattaroli (2025-12-15 03:23:59) > As it stands, mtk_clk_register_plls takes a struct device_node pointer > as its first argument. This is a tragic happenstance, as it's trivial to > get the device_node from a struct device, but the opposite not so much. > The struct device is a much more useful thing to have passed down. >=20 > Refactor mtk_clk_register_plls to take a struct device pointer instead > of a struct device_node pointer, and fix up all users of this function. >=20 > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli > --- Applied to clk-next