From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DDD6FF8855 for ; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:31:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Lq+7Y+vsXRQT8s4+vBhwnSz8vGg/ibDRCsKu2Y+cHpU=; b=PfoEqBBTDqJ1zcCYYvTl0kOwkA 2w3J2o5+YHGwVZdB/atAC1vDmb89G8ynRAfqJqHBL3fOfvq6LcNDPNFMgAW028jbPIFjReLQKZhpY JmX333zemTIj8Gert/e2ueZ0sOfoBXl2Op6rG20qBeue+pEW7XgirPnYNnDbl5ikw7YXYI7DU2S7X 6gVzH7GMytSh59LmIbfNnlSSwnZbMZTcVcIg7ECzL2reAaGg4lx3bNeYlLt/q6DZM2Xbr1jyjDBGP +Onqq5a7vXNNqX9Uo65yiUefpqRK8xpjxzLgp86PBD/K5x/veKc7zSCTU9U4ZDB6US0qCOSXRLAOd 0WV7q+Pw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wKLUK-0000000HIln-2o6B; Tue, 05 May 2026 19:31:24 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wKLUJ-0000000HIlW-1fXT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 May 2026 19:31:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D61560252; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0F32C2BCB4; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:31:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778009482; bh=GjclJVRV1WXsBgkEYNCF0uu63ubfAvR0q8rRqvwUTNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Cm6P7AxM9wyw8dxiPZS6tpdUdzCAsLqIAaYizqFTF4z9vXs6/dhxM0Wq4Jde05jrg UAvo8feUU8C3bE+4VLBb6ltBp6g7EdTBcP5bQ6dYN8gf1qEg6I9LSF7Flsz1JBKd8X /IVchF2nmdmgogq6q1buJXt1v713NmxW8ZLfQCnM3qoB/8MHdLNhutSJoG0ZE7BIMN zOhKMBhOREfV2AbdaH8ayH2zdM9hosNnKgRORUxz3O3f1Hhk17it9getJNuXKfdAdC XMdYwrTYjflOAkQUZ6zl0oXeojbBPkcIrbbzaZsrqbr/PoKWRHPssYf1Ta2Ed5O7wR AIy3m7dDJ63MQ== Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 14:31:19 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Louis Chauvet , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maarten Lankhorst , Vignesh Raghavendra , Maxime Ripard , Simona Vetter , Aradhya Bhatia , Devarsh Thakkar , Thomas Zimmermann , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Nishanth Menon , Lee Jones , David Airlie , Swamil Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Simplify binding Message-ID: <177800947953.3784799.10067421854229298328.robh@kernel.org> References: <20260420-beagley-ai-display-v1-0-f628543dfd14@ideasonboard.com> <20260420-beagley-ai-display-v1-2-f628543dfd14@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260420-beagley-ai-display-v1-2-f628543dfd14@ideasonboard.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:54:09 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > In principle the DT binding for the DSS IP should mainly cover the DSS > IP. The current binding also covers the SoC integration topics outside > the DSS, mainly via the endpoint related rules and descriptions. > > A more recent SoC, AM62P, has two instances of the DSS IP, and while > both DSS IPs are identical, they are integrated slightly differently > (e.g. which DSS output goes to an in-SoC DSI bridge, which goes to > DPI pins, etc.). > > To make the bindings usable for both DSS instances, relax the binding > slightly: remove the explicit endpoint rules, and generalize the > descriptions. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen > --- > .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 55 ++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm)