From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, bhelgaas@google.com, praan@google.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, kees@kernel.org, smostafa@google.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
skaestle@nvidia.com, mmarrid@nvidia.com, skolothumtho@nvidia.com,
bbiber@nvidia.com, harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Discard partial PRI faults on PRIQ overflow
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:14:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178908564507.2841562.2353413729337908028.b4-review@b4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c274d8836e59c549130170d5794d22e9b8c7d7a.1789081084.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> On PRIQ overflow, partial requests stored via report_partial_fault() whose
> LAST-page entry was lost stay in iopf_param->partial. Drop them by calling
> iopf_queue_discard_partial(), matching intel-iommu's handling.
>
> Do it only after the queue is fully drained, since the visible entries all
> precede the loss point: a group whose LAST-page entry is still in the queue
> gets assembled before the discard, rather than losing its stored partials
> to it.
>
> Nothing can arrive in between, as an active overflow inhibits new entries
> from being written to the PRI queue until a final CONS write acknowledges
> it (IHI0070 8.1).
>
> Suggested-by: Harsha Vardhan V <harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-5
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
--
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 23:16 [PATCH v4 00/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add PRI support Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable the impl before disabling the SMMU on shutdown Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-11 23:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_attach_release() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add Q_POS() macro Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drain in-flight fault events on domain detach Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Flush in-flight fault work " Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue without FEAT_SVA Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Submit CMDQ_OP_PRI_RESP for IOPF event Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable the queue IRQs before disabling the SMMU Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable PRI when no IRQ handler is registered Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support PRI Page Request in arm_smmu_handle_ppr() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-11 23:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Discard partial PRI faults on PRIQ overflow Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue for ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] PCI/ATS: Add PRI stubs Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] PCI/ATS: Export pci_enable_pri() and pci_reset_pri() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-10 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable PRI for PCI device in arm_smmu_probe_device() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-11 0:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178908564507.2841562.2353413729337908028.b4-review@b4 \
--to=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bbiber@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skaestle@nvidia.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox