From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99F7CA5FA5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:35:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; b=QoV+hYNzDCzoruQx9R0VrgVKdD Rp8kyF8xljhY1lol33SKzxNUBhlfq0SmJ8U0hcq4OGmFgs4jxYuET8Tk7vElby+MjcLqHeGzy0GlC GdekO475sm5iODF1yTwJzEMmEQCUJtHsTznHGBps5t9QIPiPMSWkEoF6ufYoCVKicESpH3Vtv7/2m npSQ3nYdZZtV/BVYxMvRKEm6ATCWZaOcuVz01D0eAeqDmchkVeZeHYkkSchQovMpD3KrXHGoy9Dr3 e/quSxmtvqhz5TThDvO1XxTqehNwVztH1gaSe7Q+134M+2znUbfu08fEuascWU9tWWrnS0xa1VTLB enwLt4Sw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBX2y-00000003Y8T-2kTS; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:35:00 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBX2w-00000003Y7i-15lF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:34:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE85A601FB; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB0CA1F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:34:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790685297; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=mCY7iyvEndClxYVNSOfvofhJ13wixKKmNTn9iQbVmfC6mX9Pc0Yf0io2RRDUtd+hz NebDQinSDEXLRK2dmF4BO/dqZQDv3Mj6MXTfUfYBcT8C8g2u5v2sjIAQ2++LaV70U8 gMRuEEkkVDApygS7jHuKbdkb17LRgahgHkj6HXRqx4/gBKzwdur001SCLTeA+6gKvl Oi2Au22EWzBf51csipP5AZ/fC/CG4/nOBgtImYZ8DF5YgnpgT+tiOyDWvLfuJRCB5L hl12RwbNv2pWGTnY8xpRV4Tix+/ciBAbTUNC+yI+XRZoqacsDEx/+//jqY0dDefxM+ Oa+DuROgyOKIg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Maxime Chevallier , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Disable unsolicited checksum insertion for AF_XDP TX Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:34:56 +0000 Message-ID: <179068529630.31693.11109741808641823424@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260929121032.20835-1-jszhang@kernel.org> References: <20260929121032.20835-1-jszhang@kernel.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.