Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: irq: exclude the softirq stack switch from KCOV
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 16:19:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179136595191.1063015.6426776896396499376.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926191325.79047-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>

On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 21:13:25 +0200, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> On IRQ exit, __irq_exit_rcu() drops HARDIRQ_OFFSET before calling
> invoke_softirq(). The arm64 do_softirq_own_stack() wrapper and its
> ____do_softirq() trampoline run before __do_softirq() establishes
> softirq context, so KCOV records their PCs in the interrupted task's
> coverage buffer. They also run outside softirq accounting when
> local_bh_enable() reaches do_softirq().
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: irq: exclude the softirq stack switch from KCOV
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a9cd14bfb0c1

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26 19:13 [PATCH] arm64: irq: exclude the softirq stack switch from KCOV Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-08 15:19 ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179136595191.1063015.6426776896396499376.b4-ty@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox