public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ks8695: fix __initdata annotation
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:14:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18237653.x9qPaNvtCU@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209090030.GS13664@pengutronix.de>

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 10:00:30 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-og.c b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-og.c
> > index 1f4f2f4f25bb..fa1a7c2ca2bb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-og.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-og.c
> > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init og_pci_bus_reset(void)
> >  #define      S8250_VIRT      0xf4000000
> >  #define      S8250_SIZE      0x00100000
> >  
> > -static struct __initdata map_desc og_io_desc[] = {
> > +static struct map_desc __initdata og_io_desc[] = {
> 
> I would have expected that
> 
> +static struct map_desc og_io_desc[] __initdata = {
> 
> is the correct variant?
> 

I think those two mean the exact same thing, and we have tons of examples
for either one in the kernel, unlike the one I removed. I have
verified that the resulting object files are identical.

Can you point me to some documentation that clarifies which one to use,
and why?

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-08 14:24 [PATCH] ARM: ks8695: fix __initdata annotation Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 23:36 ` Greg Ungerer
2016-02-26 16:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09  9:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-09 11:14   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-09 11:36     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-09 15:10       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18237653.x9qPaNvtCU@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox