public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: allow errata and XIP options to be enabled without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:50:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1831362.dUvM0VHfPi@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028143118.GH27405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tuesday 28 October 2014 14:31:18 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:24:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 October 2014 14:02:31 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:31:34PM +0800, Xia Kaixu wrote:
> > > > With the ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT option, it becomes much easier to
> > > > enable the ERRATA options when we know at configuration time that we
> > > > don't care about the generic case. The previous configuration makes
> > > > XIP_KERNEL option fundamentally non-MULTIPLATFORM, but it's still
> > > > valid to select it when building for !ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT and
> > > > selecting only the one machine that you want to run on.
> > > 
> > > XIP_KERNEL isn't supported on anything past ARMv5 though.
> > 
> > I would really like to get some of the platforms that currently use
> > XIP_KERNEL to use ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM in the long run. One of them
> > is EFM32, which is ARMv7-M.
> 
> Right, and on ARMv7-M, the restrictions against XIP_KERNEL don't apply.
> The restrictions on XIP_KERNEL only apply with MMU-full kernels, because
> of the remapping needed - the kernel is executed from flash, which is
> mapped separately, and that mapping needs to be setup in order to turn
> the MMU on.
> 
> With ARMv7-M, there is no MMU to worry about, no other mappings are
> required, so there is no special platform specific setup applicable.
> 
> So, I don't see any reason why XIP_KERNEL can't depend on
> !ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || CPU_V7M.

That would solve the problem for V7M, but I also don't see a reason
to disallow XIP_KERNEL on a platform that depends on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.

The main problem is that any ARMv4/v5 platform that currently uses
XIP_KERNEL breaks when we do a conversion to ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, and
I think that is bad.

The same applies to ZBOOT_ROM, which we should probably treat the
same way here. An example for that is the Renesas SH-Mobile SH7372 that
can boot directly from MMC. I really want Renesas to convert
all of their SH-Mobile machines to multiplatform, just like all other
ARMv7 platforms. There is nothing preventing you from running a
multiplatform kernel on SH7372 as long as you don't want to load the
kernel from MMC without a proper bootloader. I also don't see a reason
to take out that feature just because they are migrating to multiplatform
(there may or may not be other reasons to deprecate this feature, but that
is a different matter). At the moment SH-Mobile can be built either
as a standalone platform or as multiplatform, but even now you can build
a kernel that uses CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM_MMCIF and will only ever work on
SH7372 but includes all other shmobile targets as well.

I don't see anything wrong with that, and I would like to see this
keep working when SH7372 is part of ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, but at the
same time think it's good to have ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT to prevent
this from being selected for a kernel that is supposed to run everywhere.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-28 13:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: get a strict multiplatform kernel that can run on any hardware Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: introduce a CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT Kconfig option Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 14:18   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 14:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: change the corresponding arm/mach defconfigs Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN configuration option Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 14:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 14:37     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 14:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 16:03         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: allow errata and XIP options to be enabled without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM_STRICT Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 14:02   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 14:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 14:31       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 14:50         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-10-28 15:05           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 15:32             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: use early console instead of early debug in allmodconfig kernels Xia Kaixu
2014-10-28 14:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 14:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 14:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-28 15:01         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1831362.dUvM0VHfPi@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox