From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] New arm scmi check in linux-next causing rk3568 not to boot due to firmware bug
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 15:42:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1837825.69bXt6fAuV@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505101032.icqb2hau4dhj3afr@bogus>
On Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2022 12:10:32 CEST Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > > > > > Good day,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a user on the #linux-rockchip channel on the Libera.chat IRC network
> > > > > > reported that their RK3568 was no longer getting a CPU and GPU clock
> > > > > > from scmi and consequently not booting when using linux-next. This
> > > > > > was bisected down to the following commit:
>
> OK I missed to read the above properly earlier. If scmi probe failure is
> resulting in Linux boot failure, then that is another bug that needs fixing.
> Why does not getting CPU clock block the boot. I would like to see the boot
> logs. I considered this issue to be non-fatal and must be just ending up
> disabling all SCMI communication. But the reported issue is boot failure
> which sounds like another/different bug and I would like that to be fixed
> first before we push the workaround for the reported issue so that it is
> not ignored.
>
> Has anyone analysed why the absence of CPU clock results in boot failure ?
> Are you running the upstream kernel itself ?
>
>
Hello,
I'm sorry, I seem to have misinterpreted the original user's messages
as having been a boot failure. Upon re-reading the logs, this doesn't
seem to have been explicitly mentioned. I therefore assume this wasn't
causing a failure to boot.
Sadly the user isn't in the IRC channel at this moment so I cannot ask
them further questions.
I have tested this out on my own RK3566 based platform, and found that
we get the following:
$ sudo dmesg | grep arm-scmi
[ 0.247134] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Enabled polling mode TX channel - prot_id:16
[ 0.247526] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI Notifications - Core Enabled.
[ 0.247760] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Malformed reply - real_sz:8 calc_sz:4
[ 0.247773] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI Protocol v2.0 'rockchip:' Firmware version 0x0
[ 0.247920] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI protocol 20 not implemented
[ 1.545441] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 20 not active.
[ 1.562958] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 23 not active.
[ 1.565676] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 22 not active.
[ 2.094446] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 21 not active.
[ 2.103474] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 19 not active.
[ 5.586871] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 17 not active.
[ 5.593178] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: Failed. SCMI protocol 21 not active.
$ sudo dmesg | grep clk
[ 18.255901] panfrost fde60000.gpu: clk init failed -517
[ 18.686720] panfrost fde60000.gpu: clk init failed -517
The system does boot, it's just awfully slow. This is not a boot failure,
but arguably still a pretty bad failure mode to find oneself in.
Sorry for the confusion this caused.
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 12:49 [BUG] New arm scmi check in linux-next causing rk3568 not to boot due to firmware bug Nicolas Frattaroli
2022-05-04 13:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-04 17:51 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2022-05-05 8:03 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-05-05 9:40 ` Etienne Carriere
2022-05-05 10:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-05 13:42 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2022-05-05 10:47 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-05-05 14:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-05-12 11:11 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2022-05-12 14:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-13 8:44 ` Kever Yang
2022-05-13 8:58 ` Etienne Carriere
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1837825.69bXt6fAuV@archbook \
--to=frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).