From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:27:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: mark ezx structures as __maybe_unused In-Reply-To: <8737vbl595.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <7455848.ygDvrz6r6S@wuerfel> <8737vbl595.fsf@belgarion.home> Message-ID: <1880182.PirFZsblMo@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 09 December 2015 21:46:30 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > The ezx platform contains multiple machine descriptors, but not all > > of them use all of the data structures, and it's possible to disable > > all of the machines, which produces some harmless warnings: > > > > mach-pxa/ezx.c:53:26: warning: 'ezx_pwm_lookup' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > mach-pxa/ezx.c:86:31: warning: 'ezx_fb_info_1' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > mach-pxa/ezx.c:107:31: warning: 'ezx_fb_info_2' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > mach-pxa/ezx.c:113:32: warning: 'ezx_devices' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > mach-pxa/ezx.c:117:22: warning: 'ezx_pin_config' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > > > This marks all those structures as __maybe_unused to avoid the warnings. > > Obviously a configuration that contains the ezx platform but no specific > > model is a bit silly, but it should not cause compile-time warnings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik > > I think you'll take that through your tree, as I'm passing the v4.5 pull. If you > want me to take them, just tell me, but I think v4.5 is already prepared on your > side as I've seen a mail from Boris talking about pxa patches going through mtd > tree for v4.5. I'll apply them directly, thanks for taking a look! I'm also aware of Boris patches and don't expect a conflict here but will resolve it in arm-soc otherwise. Arnd