From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: integrator: fix section mismatch problem
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:09:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18867368.JlUVYRYg9X@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140604105726.GB23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 11:57:26 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 June 2014 12:53:22 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > This addresses a section mismatch problem in the IM-PD1
> > > driver in the Integrator/AP.
> > >
> > > The IM-PD1 contains a VIC interrupt controller and therefore
> > > the driver calls vic_init_cascaded() which is marked __init as
> > > irqchips are simply not hot-pluggable and specifically the VIC
> > > is assumed to initiate only on boot.
> > >
> > > However the module driver model of the Integrator LM bus
> > > assumes that logic tile drivers can be probed at runtime. This
> > > is not really the case for IM-PD1: these tiles are detected at
> > > boot and they cannot be plugged into a running system. Before
> > > this patch it is of course possible to modprobe them later.
> > >
> > > By first forcing the IM-PD1 to bool we make sure this driver
> > > gets compiled into the kernel, and we know it will be probed
> > > only at boot time when the tiles are detected, so we can tag
> > > its probe function __init_refok as we know it won't be called
> > > after boot now, and the section mismatch problem goes away.
> > >
> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > ARM SoC folks: please apply this directly if the solution seems
> > > acceptable.
> >
> > Looks good to me, I'm applying this on top of another fix
> > I have just added to next/soc2.
>
> That's a NAK on that until the issue I've raised has been checked.
>
Ok, I'll retract the patch, I haven't pushed the branch yet, so it's
easy to back out. Thanks for having a look at the issue so quickly.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 10:53 [PATCH] ARM: integrator: fix section mismatch problem Linus Walleij
2014-06-04 10:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-04 12:27 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-04 10:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-04 10:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-04 11:09 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18867368.JlUVYRYg9X@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox