[PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

Mark Brown
2015-01-15T20:31:59Z

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> > being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
> > subject lines in the form "ARM / ACPI:" so people could be forgiven for
> > just not even reading the e-mails enough to notice changes to their
> > subsystems. Is it worth posting those patches separately more directly
> > to the relevant maintainers?

> I think it's beneficial to post the entire series as one thread, but to
> change the subject line of each patch to adequately reflect the affected
> subsystem.

Just changing the subject lines to be more suitable would help, but
given the painful thread it's probably worth going the extra step if
the lack of these reviews is a causing problems - I know that even with
a suitable subject line if I'm busy then I'm fairly likely to zone out
something in the middle a big series that doesn't seem to be going
anywhere.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150115/6ef3c64a/attachment.sig>