From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31FE4C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wniqsN2gUvMR5MW1YQ58L1hBDsOp8UhSD0n9pTKZAMQ=; b=0Vg5/W8VKoe1mM 7k4NW5sW3ZX8/inWG51/xzqFRRYAVJV4NV6iL4Hvp3CUgmM5yTc+dGoc/noYJcq8zmWsRYGKV+qYK PSaSUs4KaMc+682IJcn6m5rzKhIyb77OxTex75j0RrH8OXJJrabBSCBXtrtSqQ+Xr45Op8HRPkYUy 1pCCScx0VlgGv3eaJvtu1N4d4tDAIQx/1jc02CJ1CCMUo2nfIPwsI86bllpMIFl+dzQfFN1h1gcAp r2lPdpULJ7VBMqHxgeUOskNJWS5eCBVrpvmOWALR1tPJN1XzxY7ndz49f1fdYb24k9HmxBbwSBsIC +IVL3BqBjUnpfvj95Ihg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1muLKy-005nUV-0C; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:15:53 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1muLJL-005mdJ-Gs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:14:12 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id bi37so28557395lfb.5 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:14:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:to:cc:references :from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nx7S1cnq+28Fds8BpEVp8gHA/k3oxCu0wS/EiP4WnR4=; b=ciwA2OG3/k5/DwImLuS7SlZ2eBaDRSvJz5llDzSA04JOYK315BDWljz8IcRkRUNYGN 1mEaVOjxYRteQzZwtWo4uL+mbK61F0D0nrxeN0tI9gaDKgdFCFhuihxIDBBRT6Y2I8LG gTHDQL5AMRImr+N2xdySzZvv+70viT+2Y1IxsGOIvO853bA74SFlHUUI+JeVSr/luuBJ Wldk/QvvdSgXMRTRbdLnUXzKyx87IQnNg5eeEkrOPqcTGWzUnHzcLecqazKFwknSMg1h esLoK5PZWyy6bvHYYuyvvASXH6Ald4yHuGYL8NGJcfXWFBH5CDsDu779L2W2hcAaz38E Q5/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nx7S1cnq+28Fds8BpEVp8gHA/k3oxCu0wS/EiP4WnR4=; b=5S7g6d0HTIL9QTWl3GUqWd6dbwvfG8PQZ20aiXmvWRzGW6QWMZKRbjvDzpIAItpBbv oyDU5/JKoPpsbrw7D47bhQo55v1WCyKrp5iOixfyBm8Ezzn2YM5Fb3p5Ig11zoq1Mmbz p9r5qXkgezt3COY21ow0SDNBr3ItzFghb1IMIr7Eww7z+NMdgHnRDI0FUg5ZoaRBSmfi NmF39Elh1qxJrHM9Bc0Ug7yjNlSz0QAlw4Cz1xLQ7l8mIf8Q2Qw/zpQRyrOcBMY9oHFK rqHsOchgsBdyQZz4tmqpsupDhKa0vHJHGP5gR3YyGLJfAVv1FKLEXPTDxPF34gYog4tG SgUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AUFB/XBvNWNKQiH6vYAYfgg3znFam45RqVrHelL83M+nfdYqo x11f2rKiH+s1LhFJRTLQn7Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXINiCNeBaG/LblOtNnudsko5e4i0c+u20gDuX2xRcTZLYNtPtqVeQoA7aNPO6/cYB+17G+w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39ca:: with SMTP id k10mr38007908lfu.426.1638825249741; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.26.149] (ip-194-187-74-233.konfederacka.maverick.com.pl. [194.187.74.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm1372137ljq.102.2021.12.06.13.14.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:14:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18ae3b7a-ba7f-44d5-db82-aa9429cf0d3a@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:14:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/95.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema To: Florian Fainelli , Guenter Roeck , Lee Jones Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Herring , Justin Chen , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Rob Herring References: <20211115055354.6089-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <78eba629-b0cf-e1db-df73-2b33fb0b4929@gmail.com> <89b9512d-2e5e-c23a-d1f2-62172c8f68f7@gmail.com> <432664af-5660-aaad-bf75-81e4d61cb078@roeck-us.net> <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= In-Reply-To: <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211206_131411_620061_998C7098 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 06.12.2021 20:43, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/6/21 11:37 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 12/6/21 11:13 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> There is simply no rush in getting the bcm7038-wdt driver to support >>> 4908 *just now*, so why don't you just take the bcm63xx-wdt series that >>> I posed, and Rafal posts an updated series that adds support for the >>> 4908 watchdog for the 5.18 cycle? >>> >> >> Your series includes the patch discussed here, and it is the first patch >> of your series. The second patch in your series depends on it. Are you >> telling me that I should drop those two patches from your series ? > > No, quite the contrary, I want you to keep the entire 7 patches that > converted the bcm7038-wdt binding to YAML and get rid of the bcm63xx-wdt > changes, the branch that you have right now is good in that regard. > > I don't see why you should be creating an immutable branch for Lee and > not simply merge Rafal's "[PATCH V4 RESEND 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: add > Broadcom's Timer-Watchdog block" patch with Lee's ack directly. This is > a new file, so I don't see how it would create conflicts as long as we > don't pile up changes on top. I'd like that pretty much as I wouldn't need to wait few extra months. Lee: would that be OK for you to simply ack 2/2? So Guenter can pick my patch without the whole immutable branch & PR thing? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel