From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:28:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Correct SYS DMAC clock defines In-Reply-To: <1391646301-20197-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> References: <1391646301-20197-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <1910899.86Rh9nDz51@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Simon, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday 06 February 2014 09:25:01 Simon Horman wrote: > This brings the implementation into line with the documentation. > > This problem was introduced when SYS DMAC clock defines were added by > ac991dce6498b5fc ("ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Add clock index macros for DT > sources") in v3.13-rc2. I do not believe this results in any problems as > these defines do not appear to be used anywhere yet. > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a7790-clock.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a7790-clock.h > b/include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a7790-clock.h index 859e9be..6548a5f 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a7790-clock.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a7790-clock.h > @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ > #define R8A7790_CLK_MSIOF1 8 > #define R8A7790_CLK_MSIOF3 15 > #define R8A7790_CLK_SCIFB2 16 > -#define R8A7790_CLK_SYS_DMAC0 18 > -#define R8A7790_CLK_SYS_DMAC1 19 > +#define R8A7790_CLK_SYS_DMAC1 18 > +#define R8A7790_CLK_SYS_DMAC0 19 > > /* MSTP3 */ > #define R8A7790_CLK_TPU0 4 -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart