From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 21:49:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] USB changes for rare warnings In-Reply-To: <87lh7161wc.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <1453997722-3489596-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <87oabxpsr8.fsf@ti.com> <87lh7161wc.fsf@belgarion.home> Message-ID: <1964102.4NLQkU883F@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 03 February 2016 20:15:47 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Felipe Balbi writes: > > > Hi Arnd, > > > >> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/ixp4xx-regs.h | 198 --------- > >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h | 163 -------- > > > > for arch/arm I need Acked-by from relevant folks. > You already have mine for arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h I think, > or did my mailer betray me again ... I saw it. > I cannot speak for ixp4xx though. Krzysztof Halasa gave an Ack for the first patch already, and I think we concluded that the patch was keeping the current behavior otherwise and is therefore not a regression, though we did not finish the side-discussion about whether ixp4xx actually works in both BE and LE mode with both indirect and direct I/O, or which of the four combinations is broken. > > Also, do you think we need this during the -rc or can we consider it > > non-critical fixes for v4.6 merge window ? I meant it for 4.6, sorry for not being very clear about that. All the warnings I fixed in this series are harmless as far as I can tell, and they only show up in rare randconfig builds. Arnd