From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 0/5] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# handling into pci core
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:44:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1979156.HCZ09VA8ni@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171226023646.17722-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 3:36:41 AM CET Jeffy Chen wrote:
>
> Currently we are handling wake irq in mrvl wifi driver. Move it into
> pci core.
>
> Tested on my chromebook bob(with cros 4.4 kernel and mrvl wifi).
>
>
> Changes in v13:
> Fix compiler error reported by kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Changes in v12:
> Only add irq definitions for PCI devices and rewrite the commit message.
> Enable the wake irq in noirq stage to avoid possible irq storm.
>
> Changes in v11:
> Address Brian's comments.
> Only support 1-per-device PCIe WAKE# pin as suggested.
> Move to pcie port as Brian suggested.
>
> Changes in v10:
> Use device_set_wakeup_capable() instead of device_set_wakeup_enable(),
> since dedicated wakeirq will be lost in device_set_wakeup_enable(false).
>
> Changes in v9:
> Add section for PCI devices and rewrite the commit message.
> Fix check error in .cleanup().
> Move dedicated wakeirq setup to setup() callback and use
> device_set_wakeup_enable() to enable/disable.
> Rewrite the commit message.
>
> Changes in v8:
> Add optional "pci", and rewrite commit message.
> Add pci-of.c and use platform_pm_ops to handle the PCIe WAKE# signal.
> Rewrite the commit message.
>
> Changes in v7:
> Move PCIE_WAKE handling into pci core.
>
> Changes in v6:
> Fix device_init_wake error handling, and add some comments.
>
> Changes in v5:
> Move to pci.txt
> Rebase.
> Use "wakeup" instead of "wake"
>
> Changes in v3:
> Fix error handling.
>
> Changes in v2:
> Use dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq.
>
> Jeffy Chen (5):
> dt-bindings: PCI: Add definition of PCIe WAKE# irq and PCI irq
> of/irq: Adjust of_pci_irq parsing for multiple interrupts
> mwifiex: Disable wakeup irq handling for pcie
> PCI / PM: Add support for the PCIe WAKE# signal for OF
> arm64: dts: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# irq to pcie port for Gru
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci.txt | 10 ++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi | 11 ++--
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 4 ++
> drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 10 ++++
> drivers/pci/pci-of.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of_pci.h | 9 ++++
> 8 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pci-of.c
I'm going to ignore this version till the discussion on the previous one is
over.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-27 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-26 2:36 [RFC PATCH v12 0/5] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# handling into pci core Jeffy Chen
2017-12-26 2:36 ` [RFC PATCH v12 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# irq to pcie port for Gru Jeffy Chen
2017-12-29 17:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-12-30 0:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-27 0:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-26 2:08 [RFC PATCH v12 0/5] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# handling into pci core Jeffy Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1979156.HCZ09VA8ni@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox