From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avri.altman@wdc.com,
martin.peter~sen@oracle.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
peter.wang@mediatek.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] scsi: ufs: introduce common delay function
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:56:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f7e050d992c67e363d6d582393c5a0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316085303.20350-4-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
On 2020-03-16 16:52, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Introduce common delay function to collect all delay requirements
> to simplify driver and take choices of udelay and usleep_range into
> consideration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 314e808b0d4e..9fea346f7d22 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,18 @@ static void ufshcd_print_pwr_info(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> hba->pwr_info.hs_rate);
> }
>
> +void ufshcd_wait_us(unsigned long us, unsigned long tolerance, bool
> can_sleep)
> +{
> + if (!us)
> + return;
> +
> + if (us < 10 || !can_sleep)
> + udelay(us);
> + else
> + usleep_range(us, us + tolerance);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_wait_us);
> +
> /*
> * ufshcd_wait_for_register - wait for register value to change
> * @hba - per-adapter interface
> @@ -620,10 +632,7 @@ int ufshcd_wait_for_register(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> u32 reg, u32 mask,
> val = val & mask;
>
> while ((ufshcd_readl(hba, reg) & mask) != val) {
> - if (can_sleep)
> - usleep_range(interval_us, interval_us + 50);
> - else
> - udelay(interval_us);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(interval_us, 50, can_sleep);
> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> if ((ufshcd_readl(hba, reg) & mask) != val)
> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> @@ -3565,7 +3574,7 @@ static inline void
> ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> }
>
> /* allow sleep for extra 50us if needed */
> - usleep_range(min_sleep_time_us, min_sleep_time_us + 50);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(min_sleep_time_us, 50, true);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -4289,7 +4298,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> * instruction might be read back.
> * This delay can be changed based on the controller.
> */
> - usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(1000, 100, true);
>
> /* wait for the host controller to complete initialization */
> retry = 10;
> @@ -4301,7 +4310,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> "Controller enable failed\n");
> return -EIO;
> }
> - usleep_range(5000, 5100);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(5000, 100, true);
> }
>
> /* enable UIC related interrupts */
> @@ -6224,7 +6233,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> reg = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
> if (reg & (1 << tag)) {
> /* sleep for max. 200us to stabilize */
> - usleep_range(100, 200);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(100, 100, true);
> continue;
> }
> /* command completed already */
> @@ -7786,7 +7795,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> */
> if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba) &&
> hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_BEFORE_LPM)
> - usleep_range(2000, 2100);
> + ufshcd_wait_us(2000, 100, true);
>
> /*
> * If UFS device is either in UFS_Sleep turn off VCC rail to save
> some
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 52425371082a..842f0223f5e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba * , void __iomem *
> , unsigned int);
> int ufshcd_make_hba_operational(struct ufs_hba *hba);
> void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *);
> int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
> +void ufshcd_wait_us(unsigned long us, unsigned long tolerance, bool
> can_sleep);
> int ufshcd_wait_for_register(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 reg, u32 mask,
> u32 val, unsigned long interval_us,
> unsigned long timeout_ms, bool can_sleep);
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-16 8:52 [PATCH v6 0/7] scsi: ufs: some cleanups and make the delay for host enabling customizable Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] scsi: ufs: fix uninitialized tx_lanes in ufshcd_disable_tx_lcc() Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] scsi: ufs: use an enum for host capabilities Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] scsi: ufs: introduce common delay function Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:56 ` Can Guo [this message]
2020-03-16 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-03-17 0:13 ` Stanley Chu
2020-03-17 3:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-03-18 6:02 ` [SPAM]Re: " Stanley Chu
2020-03-18 6:14 ` Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] scsi: ufs-mediatek: replace all delay places by " Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] scsi: ufs: allow customized delay for host enabling Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] scsi: ufs: make HCE polling more compact to improve initialization latency Stanley Chu
2020-03-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] scsi: ufs-mediatek: customize the delay for host enabling Stanley Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f7e050d992c67e363d6d582393c5a0@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.peter~sen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).