From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAAFC46467 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:13:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=PEDo7h5R16WJl/Wk6OFq7EOJhF+RwiKTd0lPlnJ7KDk=; b=dw8tqOkY5Q7REZDcrJWrtU8Awz 9vXUK2r0PRlr4FtWUvmpHH6wIz3mUUXt4tg91hacIgIufk4R9qHO0ehsZxScPGZYZGjF18CsphJ/G P1IqAsqiklS67V0D8EXJJmKNXbKEZ5AQ1DZePd1tp9Qveq86UwZg8lu6ZCmkOzGJUrVcqnzJoHHxb Uem5xtS+MrS/+CLtXq8Bd5Kk+efVVdQjcCUUrT2LdD5XxQxSeQmI4ZbpjPywjtYcc5LnD5A2McfH8 8MWJeu6pEYNOYBNeBmBNNjXViFTX+lFGREhnqpjYCr1FxequX0J9sbcT8ugjQJ/x6g7KOuRLfZhM3 mBOnUb7Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pF9kJ-005jrz-Ji; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:12:35 +0000 Received: from 0001.3ffe.de ([2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1] helo=mail.3ffe.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pF9kF-005jqA-Lx for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:12:33 +0000 Received: from 3ffe.de (0001.3ffe.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.3ffe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC192D5D; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:12:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2022082101; t=1673338346; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iMFRa+7/NK1dJc7lmfSjMtGI1fFy7cq5RFzaKFwS128=; b=YOzCn7/2cCSYkfy1TMOQKjWQNqozlQnLYcGUtj5znPzQvMWTv/MKun/muwZLewm3Lgquuf v/vCIAHQj2i22ZlbxANwqdSrF3FMWbVV7/LJ3bPXHIhDPtCddThLgQhHNuoo8vocFmgE/w nz/WisAONIOWFtmdZNo5gKRVe9BzlRwcti5ghDETUeFC5/eVUgPX/xGAQXwhpOJJAfI0zZ AZxZvN/J/Ace+ZNE10LUptRjAwcSsTo5de46RMiHfTVjQvtMJXafgsYyIwySAHmbz0q0Rx 3j10fRwktwpHBG1w0eMUroJQd0TTLztMEZy0DWp+6tWxcfvrBHOKepaTfAjTNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:12:26 +0100 From: Michael Walle To: Peng Fan Cc: Aisheng Dong , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: issue: could not get #nvmem-cell-cells In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13 Message-ID: <1a600055e8a21f6a4142b0cb7a0b96f0@walle.cc> X-Sender: michael@walle.cc X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230110_001231_903107_D3404FF1 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.93 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Peng, Am 2023-01-10 09:07, schrieb Peng Fan: > I see you have added nvmem-cell-cells support, but with linux-next, I > see error on i.MX8MP-EVK: > [ 0.027518] OF: /soc@0: could not get #nvmem-cell-cells for > /soc@0/bus@30000000/efuse@30350000/unique-id@8 > [ 0.027868] OF: /soc@0/bus@30000000/tmu@30260000: could not get > #nvmem-cell-cells for /soc@0/bus@30000000/efuse@30350000/calib@264 > [ 0.030338] OF: /soc@0/bus@30800000/ethernet@30be0000: could not > get #nvmem-cell-cells for > /soc@0/bus@30000000/efuse@30350000/mac-address@90 > [ 0.030511] OF: /soc@0/bus@30800000/ethernet@30bf0000: could not > get #nvmem-cell-cells for > /soc@0/bus@30000000/efuse@30350000/mac-address@96 > > Do you have ideas? Do you have [1] applied? It is already in -next but just to be sure. -michael [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230105135931.2743351-1-michael@walle.cc/ _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel