From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB342CAC598 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:24:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZNeGfpQkD9fJ/pYJdJLVV0A/azvebw9X720XN2OXVKQ=; b=EMjNlITWqgvc9fnkKMsJe+2RfN dwd6033+w4uU8MmDS9vkWejmCyTbnUItS6QaMxiEzc8PqJ10E+JrF8HhTFn6wrwVZC62f+CsiwvDi 4JFUmVWsW+j3cQP2g3jG19tS6s74YdsIyzxnAiaycgAiMq0xbHRt6v2s241rhpjmFT4lOUZve/vW5 pv5M4z+2UjW53bt10+7DB16PB+0KzEUYSXQqokkNPV7n7yT0k/9WgzE/wJdDkCOcc8SNiFJ3AVK6c r+zm3v2he4PVOXt4d0Ms2Ts34PkjZteL3wGxY2AY6ERIiCzjBdLv+qfvFpff+ElKVb3oI6JIOQJyx j/lbQq7Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uywp6-0000000DtYU-1nJo; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:24:08 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uywp3-0000000DtXJ-2LH7 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:24:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1758133445; x=1789669445; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQBYLBTGVcI6B/UU8+PuP9ANhqubXd++Fn247awfx+M=; b=XuWCWs+NGCzRB+Uw9EdBGC0UXe+pkX29JdZC7Nk1wnaNCGw9mjxflYGS tzJ/QfqCkPgUoRi8hJhYg+U0Kd/oefgfwxniL+3q6MVuVCbPmASTcU74z vtp0MK/l0OAkzA/AwI4TwajIDtBdd2bNDpYKq0Ek5i8CkFzhpCX3t8Hql wLSZkT1X2O1S4bxkb7KoBGUUVwcwiw27tSv3eWTt2s5GcholG6SrH03nd nJ3e0Apdu3uiH6mOMKpJxDp2nSiy9Ye4H186d8Y6yJgpFIXM5ZROIgqxF sL2GZqnfTSAgcDZgVTCEz/AlICvUGMytxJMR282TK0gcpR8VswD8iTWrn Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5jJN7IFvSvKlx8qiM0vY4w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RvhQqBJPShSHvESk7QwlQw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,272,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="214017525" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 17 Sep 2025 11:24:02 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.58; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:23:40 -0700 Received: from [10.12.48.170] (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.58 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:23:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1a740af5-78c9-421f-a58a-fd4a2066493a@microchip.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 20:23:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1 To: Stephen Boyd , Arnd Bergmann , SoC Team , , CC: Linux Kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Alexandre Belloni , Conor Dooley , Claudiu Beznea , , , kbuild test robot References: <20250916080545.9310-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> <0695ca65-536c-48d9-ad1b-49452e67a6f9@microchip.com> <175808457715.4354.11044142356915096975@lazor> From: Nicolas Ferre Content-Language: en-US, fr Organization: microchip In-Reply-To: <175808457715.4354.11044142356915096975@lazor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250917_112405_662872_FE6A6391 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Stephen, On 17/09/2025 at 06:49, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Nicolas Ferre (2025-09-16 06:19:11) >> On 16/09/2025 at 10:05, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote: >>> From: Nicolas Ferre >>> >>> Dear clock maintainers, >>> >>> Here are the first clk changes for 6.18. >>> I don't think they have conflict with changes for the deprecated round_rate() >>> to determine_rate() topic. >>> They are in linux-next for a couple of days. >> >> But... this series depends on this patch: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827145427.46819-4-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com >> >> Which will be part of a pull-request to-be-sent soon to arm-soc (which >> is part of linux-next, so the build error doesn't appear there). >> >> Once the pull-request is done, do you prefer that I do an immutable >> branch between CLK and ARM, that I queue this at91 PM patch into the clk >> pull-request or that everything goes through arm-soc? > > Whatever is required to build the code should be included in the PR. If > the same commit goes into arm-soc tree that's OK, just make sure the > branches aren't broken if you checkout a commit anywhere along the > branch that is sent to clk or arm-soc trees. Broken includes > functionally broken. Thanks for your quick response Stephen. v2 of the pull-request has just been sent. Best regards, Nicolas