From: eric.auger@redhat.com (Auger Eric)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 06/17] KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC: add refcounting for IRQs
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:58:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b593082-8313-cce5-2a30-38b55a75e894@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160628123230.26255-7-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On 28/06/2016 14:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
> In the moment our struct vgic_irq's are statically allocated at guest
> creation time. So getting a pointer to an IRQ structure is trivial and
> safe. LPIs are more dynamic, they can be mapped and unmapped at any time
> during the guest's _runtime_.
> In preparation for supporting LPIs we introduce reference counting for
> those structures using the kernel's kref infrastructure.
> Since private IRQs and SPIs are statically allocated, the reqcount never
s/reqcount/refcount
> drops to 0 at the moment, but we increase it when an IRQ gets onto a VCPU
> list and decrease it when it gets removed.
may be worth clarifying your incr/decr the refcount on vgic_get/put_irq
and each time the irq is added/removed from the ap_list.
> This introduces vgic_put_irq(), which wraps kref_put and hides the
> release function from the callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 2 ++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 8 ++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 10 +++++++---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 1 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 1 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h b/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 2f26f37..a296d94 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct vgic_irq {
> bool active; /* not used for LPIs */
> bool enabled;
> bool hw; /* Tied to HW IRQ */
> + struct kref refcount; /* Used for LPIs */
> u32 hwintid; /* HW INTID number */
> union {
> u8 targets; /* GICv2 target VCPUs mask */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> index 90cae48..ac3c1a5 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static int kvm_vgic_dist_init(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int nr_spis)
> spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
> irq->vcpu = NULL;
> irq->target_vcpu = vcpu0;
> + kref_init(&irq->refcount);
> if (dist->vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2)
> irq->targets = 0;
> else
> @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ static void kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> irq->vcpu = NULL;
> irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
> irq->targets = 1U << vcpu->vcpu_id;
> + kref_init(&irq->refcount);
> if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(i)) {
> /* SGIs */
> irq->enabled = 1;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> index a213936..4152348 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_sgir(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu,
> irq->source |= 1U << source_vcpu->vcpu_id;
>
> vgic_queue_irq_unlock(source_vcpu->kvm, irq);
> + vgic_put_irq(source_vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -116,6 +117,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_target(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
>
> val |= (u64)irq->targets << (i * 8);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return val;
> @@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_target(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->target_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, target);
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -157,6 +161,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_sgipend(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
>
> val |= (u64)irq->source << (i * 8);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> return val;
> }
> @@ -178,6 +184,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_sgipendc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->pending = false;
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -201,6 +208,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_sgipends(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> } else {
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> }
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index fc7b6c9..829909e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -80,15 +80,17 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_irouter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> int intid = VGIC_ADDR_TO_INTID(addr, 64);
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, NULL, intid);
> + unsigned long ret = 0;
>
> if (!irq)
> return 0;
>
> /* The upper word is RAZ for us. */
> - if (addr & 4)
> - return 0;
> + if (!(addr & 4))
> + ret = extract_bytes(READ_ONCE(irq->mpidr), addr & 7, len);
>
> - return extract_bytes(READ_ONCE(irq->mpidr), addr & 7, len);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void vgic_mmio_write_irouter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -112,6 +114,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_irouter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->target_vcpu = kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, irq->mpidr);
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
you need one put in:
/* The upper word is WI for us since we don't implement Aff3. */
if (addr & 4)
return;
> }
>
> static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -445,5 +448,6 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg)
> irq->pending = true;
>
> vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> index 9f6fab7..630d1c3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (irq->enabled)
> value |= (1U << i);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return value;
> @@ -74,6 +76,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_senable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> irq->enabled = true;
> vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -92,6 +96,7 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cenable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->enabled = false;
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -108,6 +113,8 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (irq->pending)
> value |= (1U << i);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return value;
> @@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_spending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->soft_pending = true;
>
> vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -152,6 +160,7 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cpending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -168,6 +177,8 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (irq->active)
> value |= (1U << i);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return value;
> @@ -190,6 +201,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_change_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> * IRQ, so we release and re-acquire the spin_lock to let the
> * other thread sync back the IRQ.
> */
> +
unrelated new line?
> while (irq->vcpu && /* IRQ may have state in an LR somewhere */
> irq->vcpu->cpu != -1) /* VCPU thread is running */
> cond_resched_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> @@ -242,6 +254,7 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cactive(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> for_each_set_bit(i, &val, len * 8) {
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
> vgic_mmio_change_active(vcpu, irq, false);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> vgic_change_active_finish(vcpu, intid);
> }
> @@ -257,6 +270,7 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_sactive(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> for_each_set_bit(i, &val, len * 8) {
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
> vgic_mmio_change_active(vcpu, irq, true);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> vgic_change_active_finish(vcpu, intid);
> }
> @@ -272,6 +286,8 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_priority(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
>
> val |= (u64)irq->priority << (i * 8);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return val;
> @@ -298,6 +314,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_priority(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> /* Narrow the priority range to what we actually support */
> irq->priority = (val >> (i * 8)) & GENMASK(7, 8 - VGIC_PRI_BITS);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -313,6 +331,8 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE)
> value |= (2U << (i * 2));
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
>
> return value;
> @@ -345,6 +365,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> irq->pending = irq->line_level | irq->soft_pending;
> }
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> +
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
you also need a put at:
if (intid + i < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
continue;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> index 80313de..cedde7d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index e48a22e..f0ac064 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 69b61ab..b90705c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -48,13 +48,20 @@ struct vgic_global __section(.hyp.text) kvm_vgic_global_state;
> struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u32 intid)
> {
> - /* SGIs and PPIs */
> - if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE)
> - return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[intid];
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> + struct vgic_irq *irq;
> +
> + if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE) { /* SGIs and PPIs */
> + irq = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[intid];
> + kref_get(&irq->refcount);
> + return irq;
> + }
>
> - /* SPIs */
> - if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_SPI)
> - return &kvm->arch.vgic.spis[intid - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS];
> + if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_SPI) { /* SPIs */
> + irq = &dist->spis[intid - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS];
> + kref_get(&irq->refcount);
> + return irq;
> + }
>
> /* LPIs are not yet covered */
> if (intid >= VGIC_MIN_LPI)
> @@ -64,6 +71,17 @@ struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +/* The refcount should never drop to 0 at the moment. */
> +static void vgic_irq_release(struct kref *ref)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(1);
> +}
> +
> +void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
> +{
> + kref_put(&irq->refcount, vgic_irq_release);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_vgic_target_oracle - compute the target vcpu for an irq
> *
> @@ -236,6 +254,7 @@ retry:
> goto retry;
> }
>
> + kref_get(&irq->refcount);
> list_add_tail(&irq->ap_list, &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head);
> irq->vcpu = vcpu;
>
> @@ -269,14 +288,17 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
> if (!irq)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (irq->hw != mapped_irq)
> + if (irq->hw != mapped_irq) {
> + vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> if (!vgic_validate_injection(irq, level)) {
> /* Nothing to see here, move along... */
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
maybe a goto label would be relevant?
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -288,6 +310,7 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
> }
>
> vgic_queue_irq_unlock(kvm, irq);
> + vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -330,6 +353,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)
> irq->hwintid = phys_irq;
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -349,6 +373,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> irq->hwintid = 0;
>
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
put at:
if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
return -EAGAIN;
Cheers
Eric
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -386,6 +411,7 @@ retry:
> list_del(&irq->ap_list);
> irq->vcpu = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -614,6 +640,7 @@ bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> map_is_active = irq->hw && irq->active;
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> return map_is_active;
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index c752152..5b79c34 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct vgic_vmcr {
>
> struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u32 intid);
> +void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq);
> bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq);
> void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 12:32 [PATCH v7 00/17] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] KVM: arm/arm64: move redistributor kvm_io_devices Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 15:58 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] KVM: arm/arm64: check return value for kvm_register_vgic_device Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 15:59 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-30 16:19 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] KVM: arm/arm64: extend arch CAP checks to allow per-VM capabilities Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] KVM: kvm_io_bus: add kvm_io_bus_get_dev() call Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 15:58 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC: add refcounting for IRQs Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 15:58 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2016-06-30 15:17 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] irqchip: refactor and add GICv3 definitions Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] KVM: arm64: handle ITS related GICv3 redistributor registers Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 16:21 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] KVM: arm64: introduce ITS emulation file with MMIO framework Andre Przywara
2016-07-04 8:17 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-04 13:38 ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-04 13:54 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-04 14:00 ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-04 14:15 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] KVM: arm64: introduce new KVM ITS device Andre Przywara
2016-07-04 9:00 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-04 14:05 ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-04 14:27 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-04 14:32 ` Peter Maydell
2016-07-04 15:00 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-04 17:40 ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-05 7:40 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-05 8:59 ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-05 9:13 ` Auger Eric
2016-07-05 9:55 ` Peter Maydell
2016-07-05 8:34 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] KVM: arm64: implement basic ITS register handlers Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] KVM: arm64: connect LPIs to the VGIC emulation Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] KVM: arm64: read initial LPI pending table Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] KVM: arm64: allow updates of LPI configuration table Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] KVM: arm64: implement ITS command queue command handlers Andre Przywara
2016-06-30 11:22 ` Diana Madalina Craciun
2016-06-30 14:06 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] KVM: arm64: implement MSI injection in ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-06-28 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] KVM: arm64: enable ITS emulation as a virtual MSI controller Andre Przywara
2016-06-29 16:34 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-29 4:43 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Bharat Bhushan
2016-06-30 10:09 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-30 11:40 ` Andrew Jones
2016-06-30 12:03 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b593082-8313-cce5-2a30-38b55a75e894@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).