* [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented.
@ 2009-09-15 10:01 Jassi
2009-09-15 10:13 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-16 0:23 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jassi @ 2009-09-15 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The available irq handler simply doesn't work. The Dma state-machine
is broken. This patch fixes it.
Also, chan->curr,next,end pointer manipulation is protected.
Signed-Off-by: Jassi <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
index 02bc82b..e68469d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
@@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *next;
struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
struct pl080s_lli *lli;
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret;
WARN_ON(!chan);
@@ -366,6 +367,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
s3c64xx_dma_fill_lli(chan, lli, data, size);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
if ((next = chan->next) != NULL) {
struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *end = chan->end;
struct pl080s_lli *endlli = end->lli;
@@ -399,6 +402,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, lli);
}
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
show_lli(lli);
dbg_showchan(chan);
@@ -562,27 +567,13 @@ int s3c2410_dma_free(unsigned int channel, struct s3c2410_dma_client *client)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(s3c2410_dma_free);
-
-static void s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
-{
- struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan = dmac->channels + offs;
-
- /* note, we currently do not bother to work out which buffer
- * or buffers have been completed since the last tc-irq. */
-
- if (chan->callback_fn)
- (chan->callback_fn)(chan, chan->curr->pw, 0, S3C2410_RES_OK);
-}
-
-static void s3c64xx_dma_errirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
-{
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: offs %d\n", __func__, offs);
-}
-
static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
{
+ struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac = pw;
- u32 tcstat, errstat;
+ struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan;
+ enum s3c2410_dma_buffresult res;
+ u32 tcstat, errstat, val;
u32 bit;
int offs;
@@ -590,15 +581,41 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
errstat = readl(dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_STATUS);
for (offs = 0, bit = 1; offs < 8; offs++, bit <<= 1) {
+
+ if (!(errstat & bit) && !(tcstat & bit))
+ continue;
+
+ res = S3C2410_RES_ERR;
+
+ if (errstat & bit)
+ writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
+
if (tcstat & bit) {
writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_TC_CLEAR);
- s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(dmac, offs);
+ res = S3C2410_RES_OK;
}
- if (errstat & bit) {
- s3c64xx_dma_errirq(dmac, offs);
- writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
+ chan = dmac->channels + offs;
+ if(chan->curr == NULL)
+ continue;
+
+ buff = chan->curr;
+ if (chan->curr != chan->end) {
+ BUG_ON(chan->curr->next == NULL);
+ chan->curr = chan->curr->next;
+
+ val = readl(chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
+ if (!(val & PL080_CONFIG_ACTIVE)) {
+ s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, chan->curr->lli);
+ val |= PL080_CONFIG_ENABLE;
+ writel(val, chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
+ }
+ } else {
+ chan->curr = chan->next = chan->end = NULL;
}
+
+ s3c64xx_dma_bufffdone(chan, buff, res);
+ s3c64xx_dma_freebuff(buff);
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
--
1.6.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented.
2009-09-15 10:01 [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented Jassi
@ 2009-09-15 10:13 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-15 11:04 ` jassi brar
2009-09-16 0:23 ` Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2009-09-15 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:01:23PM +0900, Jassi wrote:
> + if (errstat & bit)
> + writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
The old code would complain in the logs on error, which seems like a
reasonable approach if we've no better idea what to do - it at least
tells people something about what might be going on if things break.
> + chan = dmac->channels + offs;
> + if(chan->curr == NULL)
> + continue;
It's probably a good idea to run your patches through
scripts/checkpatch.pl before submitting them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented.
2009-09-15 10:13 ` Mark Brown
@ 2009-09-15 11:04 ` jassi brar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jassi brar @ 2009-09-15 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:01:23PM +0900, Jassi wrote:
>
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (errstat & bit)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
>
> The old code would complain in the logs on error, which seems like a
> reasonable approach if we've no better idea what to do - it at least
> tells people something about what might be going on if things break.
Yes, some debug mssg wud be better.
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? chan = dmac->channels + offs;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if(chan->curr == NULL)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? continue;
>
> It's probably a good idea to run your patches through
> scripts/checkpatch.pl before submitting them.
ahhhh.... my me!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented.
2009-09-15 10:01 [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented Jassi
2009-09-15 10:13 ` Mark Brown
@ 2009-09-16 0:23 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-16 2:43 ` jassi brar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2009-09-16 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:01:23PM +0900, Jassi wrote:
> The available irq handler simply doesn't work. The Dma state-machine
> is broken. This patch fixes it.
A better explanation would have been nice, so I could actually evaluate
what is going on here.
> Also, chan->curr,next,end pointer manipulation is protected.
Should have been a seperate patch, I would have been able to apply that
reasonably easily.
> Signed-Off-by: Jassi <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
> index 02bc82b..e68469d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
> struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *next;
> struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
> struct pl080s_lli *lli;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> WARN_ON(!chan);
> @@ -366,6 +367,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
>
> s3c64xx_dma_fill_lli(chan, lli, data, size);
>
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> if ((next = chan->next) != NULL) {
> struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *end = chan->end;
> struct pl080s_lli *endlli = end->lli;
> @@ -399,6 +402,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
> s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, lli);
> }
>
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> show_lli(lli);
>
> dbg_showchan(chan);
> @@ -562,27 +567,13 @@ int s3c2410_dma_free(unsigned int channel, struct s3c2410_dma_client *client)
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(s3c2410_dma_free);
>
> -
> -static void s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
> -{
> - struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan = dmac->channels + offs;
> -
> - /* note, we currently do not bother to work out which buffer
> - * or buffers have been completed since the last tc-irq. */
> -
> - if (chan->callback_fn)
> - (chan->callback_fn)(chan, chan->curr->pw, 0, S3C2410_RES_OK);
> -}
I belive a callback is necessary for the audio code to update the
current dma position of the stream. I also thought this worked?
> -static void s3c64xx_dma_errirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
> -{
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: offs %d\n", __func__, offs);
> -}
> -
> static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
> {
> + struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
> struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac = pw;
> - u32 tcstat, errstat;
> + struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan;
> + enum s3c2410_dma_buffresult res;
> + u32 tcstat, errstat, val;
> u32 bit;
> int offs;
>
> @@ -590,15 +581,41 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
> errstat = readl(dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_STATUS);
>
> for (offs = 0, bit = 1; offs < 8; offs++, bit <<= 1) {
> +
> + if (!(errstat & bit) && !(tcstat & bit))
> + continue;
> +
> + res = S3C2410_RES_ERR;
> +
> + if (errstat & bit)
> + writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
> +
> if (tcstat & bit) {
> writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_TC_CLEAR);
> - s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(dmac, offs);
> + res = S3C2410_RES_OK;
> }
>
> - if (errstat & bit) {
> - s3c64xx_dma_errirq(dmac, offs);
> - writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
> + chan = dmac->channels + offs;
> + if(chan->curr == NULL)
> + continue;
> +
> + buff = chan->curr;
> + if (chan->curr != chan->end) {
> + BUG_ON(chan->curr->next == NULL);
> + chan->curr = chan->curr->next;
> +
> + val = readl(chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
> + if (!(val & PL080_CONFIG_ACTIVE)) {
> + s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, chan->curr->lli);
> + val |= PL080_CONFIG_ENABLE;
> + writel(val, chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
> + }
> + } else {
> + chan->curr = chan->next = chan->end = NULL;
> }
> +
> + s3c64xx_dma_bufffdone(chan, buff, res);
> + s3c64xx_dma_freebuff(buff);
> }
Hmm, this looks like a train wreck. Please do not move code around
like this.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented.
2009-09-16 0:23 ` Ben Dooks
@ 2009-09-16 2:43 ` jassi brar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jassi brar @ 2009-09-16 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:01:23PM +0900, Jassi wrote:
>> Also, chan->curr,next,end pointer manipulation is protected.
>
> Should have been a seperate patch, I would have been able to apply that
> reasonably easily.
Ok, will resend as a separate patch.
>> Signed-Off-by: Jassi <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> ?arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c | ? 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> ?1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
>> index 02bc82b..e68469d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/dma.c
>> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
>> ? ? ? struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *next;
>> ? ? ? struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
>> ? ? ? struct pl080s_lli *lli;
>> + ? ? unsigned long flags;
>> ? ? ? int ret;
>>
>> ? ? ? WARN_ON(!chan);
>> @@ -366,6 +367,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
>>
>> ? ? ? s3c64xx_dma_fill_lli(chan, lli, data, size);
>>
>> + ? ? local_irq_save(flags);
>> +
>> ? ? ? if ((next = chan->next) != NULL) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *end = chan->end;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct pl080s_lli *endlli = end->lli;
>> @@ -399,6 +402,8 @@ int s3c2410_dma_enqueue(unsigned int channel, void *id,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, lli);
>> ? ? ? }
>>
>> + ? ? local_irq_restore(flags);
>> +
>> ? ? ? show_lli(lli);
>>
>> ? ? ? dbg_showchan(chan);
>> @@ -562,27 +567,13 @@ int s3c2410_dma_free(unsigned int channel, struct s3c2410_dma_client *client)
>>
>> ?EXPORT_SYMBOL(s3c2410_dma_free);
>>
>> -
>> -static void s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
>> -{
>> - ? ? struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan = dmac->channels + offs;
>> -
>> - ? ? /* note, we currently do not bother to work out which buffer
>> - ? ? ?* or buffers have been completed since the last tc-irq. */
>> -
>> - ? ? if (chan->callback_fn)
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? (chan->callback_fn)(chan, chan->curr->pw, 0, S3C2410_RES_OK);
>> -}
>
> I belive a callback is necessary for the audio code to update the
> current dma position of the stream. I also thought this worked?
Of course, it is necessary. And my patch doesn't skip that.
Instead of special wrapper for callback during TC-IRQ, I make use of
the existing function s3c64xx_dma_buffdone with return code as per the
IRQ status.
Also, with the patch, callback_fn is called for each buffer
that was enqueued.
>> -static void s3c64xx_dma_errirq(struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac, int offs)
>> -{
>> - ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: offs %d\n", __func__, offs);
>> -}
>> -
>> ?static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
>> ?{
>> + ? ? struct s3c64xx_dma_buff *buff;
>> ? ? ? struct s3c64xx_dmac *dmac = pw;
>> - ? ? u32 tcstat, errstat;
>> + ? ? struct s3c2410_dma_chan *chan;
>> + ? ? enum s3c2410_dma_buffresult res;
>> + ? ? u32 tcstat, errstat, val;
>> ? ? ? u32 bit;
>> ? ? ? int offs;
>>
>> @@ -590,15 +581,41 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c64xx_dma_irq(int irq, void *pw)
>> ? ? ? errstat = readl(dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_STATUS);
>>
>> ? ? ? for (offs = 0, bit = 1; offs < 8; offs++, bit <<= 1) {
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!(errstat & bit) && !(tcstat & bit))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? continue;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? res = S3C2410_RES_ERR;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (errstat & bit)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
>> +
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (tcstat & bit) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_TC_CLEAR);
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_dma_tcirq(dmac, offs);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? res = S3C2410_RES_OK;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>>
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? if (errstat & bit) {
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_dma_errirq(dmac, offs);
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(bit, dmac->regs + PL080_ERR_CLEAR);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? chan = dmac->channels + offs;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if(chan->curr == NULL)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? continue;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? buff = chan->curr;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (chan->curr != chan->end) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? BUG_ON(chan->curr->next == NULL);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? chan->curr = chan->curr->next;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? val = readl(chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!(val & PL080_CONFIG_ACTIVE)) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_lli_to_regs(chan, chan->curr->lli);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? val |= PL080_CONFIG_ENABLE;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(val, chan->regs + PL080S_CH_CONFIG);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? chan->curr = chan->next = chan->end = NULL;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_dma_bufffdone(chan, buff, res);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c64xx_dma_freebuff(buff);
>> ? ? ? }
>
> Hmm, this looks like a train wreck. Please do not move code around
> like this.
Please have a parallel look at the driver with and without the patch
to see the overall picture.
I know the reviewer shudn't need to do that, but its code modified
more than moved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-16 2:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-15 10:01 [PATCH 5/7] S3C64XX DMA: TC-IRQ implemented Jassi
2009-09-15 10:13 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-15 11:04 ` jassi brar
2009-09-16 0:23 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-16 2:43 ` jassi brar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).