From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jassisinghbrar@gmail.com (jassi brar)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:15:28 +0900
Subject: [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines
In-Reply-To: <20100127081140.GK9153@trinity.fluff.org>
References: <1264571873-14924-1-git-send-email-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
	<20100127081140.GK9153@trinity.fluff.org>
Message-ID: <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@samsung.com>
>>
>> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly.
>> The patch corrects and adds missing pins.
>
> Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus?
Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due.
Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion?
thanks