linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jassisinghbrar@gmail.com (jassi brar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral Multiplexing) in linux
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:37:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b68c6791003150237k3d1508d3meb8370509dcfc9a8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9DF966.6050504@st.com>

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@st.com> wrote:
> yes, and if you see, should any one require it dynamically? Each user
> would have his own board with static devices. This configuration (of
> selecting multiplexed devices) depends on his board configuration, which
> is the responsibility of the board configuration file.
sorry for barging in but ...
usually device makers(that release product versions with same SoC but
different devices)
want a single kernel image that detects the machine type and
accordingly populate the
device support. Managing separate images for similar devices is
considered inefficient.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-15  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-15  4:31 QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral Multiplexing) in linux Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  4:47 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15  5:14   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  5:41     ` jassi brar
2010-03-15  6:32       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  6:46         ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:55         ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 13:15         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 13:22           ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-16  2:01           ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:52     ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 16:02       ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 16:53         ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-15 16:53         ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 17:09           ` Mark Brown
2010-03-15 18:57             ` Tony Lindgren
2010-03-15 18:58               ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 16:58         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15  4:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15  5:15   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  5:28     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15  6:34       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  6:20 ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-15  6:28   ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  8:42     ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15  9:09       ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  9:37         ` jassi brar [this message]
2010-03-15 10:22           ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 10:34             ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 10:55               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:37             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:10         ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 10:27           ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  7:06   ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-17 16:30     ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-19  4:45       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 17:55 ` Linus Walleij
2010-03-16 13:39   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-16 21:55     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b68c6791003150237k3d1508d3meb8370509dcfc9a8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).