RE: (subset) [PATCH v4 0/4] gpio: realtek: Add support for Realtek DHC RTD1625

["Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君]" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>]

> On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 09:57:19 +0200, "andriy.shevchenko@intel.com"
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> said:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 12:24:16AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:55:26 +0200, "Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君]"
> >> <eleanor.lin@realtek.com> said:
> >> >> On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:23:31 +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> >> Applied, thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> [1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: realtek: Add realtek,rtd1625-gpio
> >> >>
> >> >> https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/8f32808e1530b2229e07695fb39c54fee910
> >> >> bd4a [2/4] gpio: Replace "default y" with "default ARCH_REALTEK"
> >> >> in Kconfig
> >> >>
> >> >> https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/b5d23fcdb12972c522e96f90ab48be8a0d97
> >> >> 1b0e [3/4] gpio: realtek: Add driver for Realtek DHC RTD1625 SoC
> >> >>
> >> >> https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/a57e27c43b0315ee86c6896510d69be5257e
> >> >> 093e
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for applying the patches!
> >> >
> >> > I'm currently working on v6 of the patch series that incorporates
> >> > Andy's gpio-regmap patches, and it should build on top of
> >> > gpio/for-next. However, I have a conflict with the driver patch that was
> already applied.
> >> >
> >> > Could you please revert that commit from gpio/for-next?
> >>
> >> Can you just post the series as a follow-up? I try to avoid rebases
> >> unless absolutely necessary.
> >
> > Would be just leading reverts in the series appropriate? Otherwise it
> > will give a lot of additional work for peanuts.
> >
> 
> Yes, that's alright. It will make the review easier. We can then squash the
> reverts with the new patches when applying.
> 

Understood, thanks!
I'll add the revert as the first patch in the series.

Best Regards,
Yu-Chun

> Bart