From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A37C48BC3 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:To:Cc: Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ijoOAIab2vlCgGM3ssDMerjM+hkzTdwOd67x4Yjt148=; b=w3u+y/Jj5hCLWt UeYw48ttvcPkncmrTDQ2rmJIaFdHwy0dC88GU6exbdV11Und5nSOyFmP4MCDJ5ksOAKhhYLAc7ORy 1aOJm35RPfHOmjL7qD9ZbkKLuTLwrlV86jv5H/Cu9b+LCPxiEiqMiZPQLv1Gk7V9mJTlMCOOUH8pS +/wmT5pCCKN/D5QiRe/bBMI5vFOwduYw+mXbrzBAHlcTTb7He/+jzHCO4ElVFOaL8ov9BeysyMlvT nMo+QIq/ZxTPo1QUAdkLAzUpX9QZEWJt7kQtVI+lk3oMDrs8JhL/HnX6U7Na6RDEWzIlWuwhiFvyj Srponx2gmaKyS6Xpq1uA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rbHmH-00000005LCo-07jB; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:37 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rbHmF-00000005LBt-2bzQ; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:35 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject: Message-ID:MIME-Version:To:Cc:Date:References:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=18wiLwUjP+3iwMeJRi0UK+Vyjz1VhIuq2eIyZQopofc=; b=oqeMNT1ZZP2on4DWHjvTuAG0bN LNhDvR7Es4MdFe/HvHp5R+IVmp87xzwR1HcABZ2i846NrRu+oQmJJs8MaNOQAtqV3hrejjwwKIqUL 3B8+AJFBcp3ktBPtW6aBGdI6rh96mZ0oDbo3B/aCFLpVC78hU/RrriXvG3Zj6y7szEvWqQpmGVXCW aM/WPaMEppF+8/teUBBchHnC8r+MkjtBfK0gzd+hV1keWGjmzYRJNjwpgZVUyyaA7J8YvjLWMN9P3 G44+4eYk2NTaBrtmtIi8wOCfQlNOV8VhCr4NakpZbJ44clK9sQFE4DXaeu84rJ6Bt1ZfxHJ8svtYN cNfENabg==; Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com ([2a00:1098:ed:100::25]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rbHmB-00000000JQS-3y6I; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:34 +0000 Received: from hamburger.collabora.co.uk (hamburger.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:1c1b:c794::1]) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47B3780A0B; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shreeya Patel" In-Reply-To: <0c2f4d92-afa9-46f1-844e-994bd45924ef@linaro.org> X-Forward: 127.0.0.1 References: <20240216094922.257674-1-shreeya.patel@collabora.com> <20240216094922.257674-2-shreeya.patel@collabora.com> <237e690a-2f49-4046-b054-3a878eed6748@linaro.org> <30d2-65cf5980-3-2ec9f500@242931553> <0c2f4d92-afa9-46f1-844e-994bd45924ef@linaro.org> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:18:26 +0000 Cc: heiko@sntech.de, mchehab@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, jose.abreu@synopsys.com, nelson.costa@synopsys.com, dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, shawn.wen@rock-chips.com, kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-dt@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm@lists.infradead.org To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1b9-65d08800-3-19290580@120474537> Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?= [PATCH 1/4] =?utf-8?q?clk=3A?==?utf-8?q?_rockchip=3A?= =?utf-8?q?_rst-rk3588=3A?= Add BIU reset User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.9.1 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240217_101832_286946_341205F3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Saturday, February 17, 2024 13:47 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote: > >>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel > >>> --- > >>> drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 + > >>> include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++ > >> > >> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some > >> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix. > >> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear. > >> > >> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you: > >> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch > >> with errors to the mailing list? > >> > > > > I am sorry but what errors are you talking about? > > I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :- > > > > shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch > > WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst > > Here. > > > > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked > > > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > > > hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review. > > > > I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me. > > Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not? > OK, now I see what you meant. Since we are touching the include file and C file together, this warning was generated. It was a bit confusing to interpret this as the warning also talks about Documentation which we didn't touch at all. Anyway, I will create two separate patches for this in v2. Thanks, Shreeya Patel > Best regards, > Krzysztof > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel