From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E809CC0219B for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:40:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eWp3/7u/YGZGIa4esPL/qdeKIFhCL8Y51K+5X7MdHlg=; b=dMTvnKFlv8gELXB1F+SY2c/gnq hYTbwp8WpeozTJoMlnDa9DzY6abI6/UUYjxsr9VYFX6CVEaXy7nKIZ43xcmnPA+EoY/mhHYuOzQQm DtBD2o5hatVx18DihWzRgpa4Yadmahbdvj86Tumh+lLleK4bNHEAjj4wm4wWkqrswryg0MX0jGYSJ muChLUiUVmwTT3bA3ve9HH1AAq8bTJq+T9REaWNCArK1Hs8KdBtjO4lqJTSqUiiqPPcaefdmiCBED lCVSV7K+AFo7nMqQjyptl9dlXcZAek8ZCoIwpS+oboRroZlCUZfHmrH01i1TGIrJeGZBV/ID1Gn0V mYixm7EA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thqUX-00000003z4w-0znB; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:39:57 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thqLO-00000003xGD-17u6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:30:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E316D5C177A; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EB85C4CEDD; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:30:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739280629; bh=eWp3/7u/YGZGIa4esPL/qdeKIFhCL8Y51K+5X7MdHlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=n9gqu24NHccx3CJwhPeIbz+oIvdMFCOC9QlPIZv22uUw4yW754WoHr3i6ZRQ7Pb6m q50KRyWph+Zz2w6RHWGtNDzciBzuqtax11vFLj6waBLqD8yq4LVF2Zg8H3zoSuKj73 ao0nLUmWKSRMLXkHzCeA5skOaDs1bGgrR8JYmMbEv4kVAvfqnfJWhznOnIhRVmvXSp 1xzy0pFEEduTAyGLg6AJshCNI6viDs7iGFCqQMBziUTRAwlqe3Jsa2STefG4nl1Qor NZJy94G1QGS0EdxV04rl8su7yf3Kv5hQfsw0OPsqdN2lJ4VFwuCltqr72HYz81pNDZ HZXe21VwM2xzQ== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:30:25 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add missing registrations of SF8MMx hwcaps Message-ID: <1be1b5e9-9aa9-4f1c-9cdc-c4bf94f2dbc8@sirena.org.uk> References: <20250210-arm64-fix-2024-dpisa-v1-1-d77f43c7b253@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FpVZgrr+qSAHu3wx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Printed on recycled paper. X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250211_053030_347471_5E120E17 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --FpVZgrr+qSAHu3wx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 01:15:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:58:10PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Well, I was actually intending to send a separate patch given that > > otherwise it ends up looking like two different changelogs in the same > > patch and the diffs shouldn't overlap. > It would be simpler for others if you sent a single patch that handled > the three hwcaps that we failed to wire up in commit 819935464cb2. That > way they only have one thing to track. > I don't understand what you mean by "two different changelogs"; surely the > commit message is a trivial variation of the one for this v1 patch: My first scan through had made it look like there was more stuff missing for FPRCVT but now that I go to write the change that's not actually the case, it's different handling of the different ID registers. --FpVZgrr+qSAHu3wx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEyBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmerUPAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Canwf2PMWht5FD5jL70uPgRegmvsxuqGuFL+om4rJ29M7MvxSFKsMWR3t7DEAN sCxfPXEz6vW4+pS1w2nadqCMnyfn6dINYQwDeolVIn6apD8lf2SlzeY+XrZT8YiH tJxBHYnjOz3Rk0HG8vLtp9eeIDsQ+NlUXXzr2658POQ3FLR3qI6Ekp7jzd+KEpbi OjgkUWf7zyvciwMwpzXmgN15fTedVixZRYNt/cwC5d286vVcBOi8M5PGzYR2Sh0i CevmEdOi22rMmTlR3ObkXMlp7DEK3tZ1VunkBFPn6h94i+A4ZVwPRf2vbzQNGROJ Q7NRWHwGCb4dDpkR2GBbcDULF8tm =qyk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FpVZgrr+qSAHu3wx--