From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D682C433E6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5967020848 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Ng7NlD25"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="LEr4JJb5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5967020848 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=R4+meOqsIst5kdSTbxrABmryjcPQc5APOUQ/vz6x5Sc=; b=Ng7NlD25COslH8dQDAaSsNtRR hDcVHHZX0vmV7vW6ysg3AGqrOPNpCkc8r9ubRh2y8PI3Dwak2xC7nIs3SKc1Dy8P8BGmyKYYhQaZE SPsuSdgOPYerKFfr3OgOLwv+eVplq2y8TiKauxztIr8k2NEp8QkdkXhbYH0iPlQp9YDuh+8vcBooy cIGdqmQNkcQSRKUI1hrZzFcqQPkOY8/XkDFAnMVi6kcazpZVxunFfqF+j9sNXB5trILQJuyr5Jo3h tIXndnWBjWDi+BzAdsxVwn+x/6ouF9h0PwNVvxgD+Br8o68MzB29/acq8hd0YS8AmmbwuyqD50QN4 fy3XPbFpw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBUqe-0004fg-Gr; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:14:40 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBUqc-0004fJ-EZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:14:39 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3EZlD118838; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598584475; bh=loeDIemJjUVPeE1cWTUci6Wghq6KHUlVFllx5h1Rt+k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LEr4JJb5eOURW/J17iHQT1EtWfV/vv2k2k82dO2M3E2aS1+jjedPCNfiNCCtToJAX pPdwWjpk3qhBCzGCXusqKHu3m4FldlP+7BdXVniNql0q6zQZo+7f4x8tHxtiFg0dZ+ eA0AGPuCnVqKzuD3+BLAqwbO+kiY+4eypgg3YCWg= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07S3EZ54017744 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3EVhc015962; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Convert K3 board/soc bindings to DT schema To: Nishanth Menon References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200827065144.17683-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:44:30 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200827_231438_810416_4C2F69A0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Nishanth, On 28/08/20 6:11 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 12:21-20200827, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > Thanks for doing this, but I have a problem with dbs_check and dtbs > W=2 build warnings on existing dts files that this exposes further.. IMHO, that should not block the conversion to yaml bindings. May I know the problem you are seeing? > Do you mind pulling this patch out of this j7200 series ? I would > rather us cleanup the warnings a bit as well, and deal with yaml > conversion seperate from j7200 bindings? Ill wait for Rob's view on this. He already asked to convert it during J721e binding update. Not sure we would like to delay any further. Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > We will need Rob's ack anyways, I would rather we look at things > independently. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel