From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78705C7EE25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:30:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=oBHes/svHnDuvkengz2AdpZ89XZ1myF7IPBHNQ+4sjw=; b=VUd7JAz4jiSPvPywydHAMuwKW3 ri9oqZ51YtwxM/TgrTqQMmdoP6no8rO+ZVML+R7tl/49frOMywvJl/RHR/SSBoM5gyRV2gQq3AxKz HLAx5CtAKQ2zvYTXVUCEVs5BFzDIZdMPq9r7lSmLC569tPUqUTP9zwULmfwDw8/Q6aytm7Dsav3Zo xDLMKFRESRsjGSdK6w0S+VGLWpfNHRYo0g46l+2o1yVpEtdlPasBUGrsze0JcAcKdtn90TTCK884n B9b8tgkfbafEX8m8ZrCsCWL8sEwiAxs+nuXjS3h6GjHD4FaXm387F6R4iCR8cSdhQaB7xHxDdvWcl 41edXwww==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7EmZ-009Kx3-2X; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 12:30:27 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7EmV-009Kv9-0E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 12:30:26 +0000 Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QcNkq5nzFzLqJg; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:27:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.102.169] (10.67.102.169) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:30:18 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/perf: hisi: Don't migrate perf to the CPU going to teardown To: Junhao He , , , , CC: , , , , , References: <20230608114326.27649-1-hejunhao3@huawei.com> From: Yicong Yang Message-ID: <1e6ebefe-5a9b-2d14-6474-86e9eaf94656@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:30:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230608114326.27649-1-hejunhao3@huawei.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.67.102.169] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230608_053023_299362_B7743F20 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2023/6/8 19:43, Junhao He wrote: > The driver needs to migrate the perf context if the current using CPU going > to teardown. By the time calling the cpuhp::teardown() callback the > cpu_online_mask() hasn't updated yet and still includes the CPU going to > teardown. In current driver's implementation we may migrate the context > to the teardown CPU and leads to the below calltrace: > > ... > [ 368.104662][ T932] task:cpuhp/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 15 ppid: 2 flags:0x00000008 > [ 368.113699][ T932] Call trace: > [ 368.116834][ T932] __switch_to+0x7c/0xbc > [ 368.120924][ T932] __schedule+0x338/0x6f0 > [ 368.125098][ T932] schedule+0x50/0xe0 > [ 368.128926][ T932] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x24 > [ 368.134229][ T932] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x1d4/0x5dc > [ 368.139617][ T932] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x30 > [ 368.144573][ T932] mutex_lock+0x50/0x60 > [ 368.148579][ T932] perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x84/0x2b0 > [ 368.153884][ T932] hisi_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu+0x90/0xe0 [hisi_pcie_pmu] > [ 368.160579][ T932] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2a0/0x650 > [ 368.165707][ T932] cpuhp_thread_fun+0xe4/0x190 > [ 368.170316][ T932] smpboot_thread_fn+0x15c/0x1a0 > [ 368.175099][ T932] kthread+0x108/0x13c > [ 368.179012][ T932] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > ... > > Use function cpumask_any_but() to find one correct active cpu to fixes > this issue. > > Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU") > Signed-off-by: Junhao He Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang > --- > drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c > index 0bc8dc36aff5..14f8b4b03337 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c > @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static int hisi_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node) > > pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1; > /* Choose a new CPU from all online cpus. */ > - target = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > + target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu); > if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) { > pci_err(pcie_pmu->pdev, "There is no CPU to set\n"); > return 0; > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel