From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB12C2D0CD for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 12:00:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=LyJ1jrcuBjyD0erI/sIvdiDxLNsydKh62Md2c5GBiwQ=; b=gC/RTtvYQlnq2os1okSWreFMLt 9wH6DzBh/L/c/JIhIoNbWI4ZEUMJzSrWqUvm2s4LQZccSY0ek2n9TcLsKkxKtlmufjUw61C4ec48Z o0e+RxdeMh6BayzV3bNmbHXKpEysvdEwthNbwKZetzuxF+B0O0vrCi7lcWD5PfJbLDtTve7hhgS2v PAjITckYZSMbwic85AQnDRY8h5bCBWr3PA2fD8guqU+4mPcCqFDsIz6igou+RibQpVfw72+pNnMqm ClCuyZmGCDZBzYyzKhf7pffvZ429brLwHkNcwYaKYZfGGh6bki384II38HcRuh/Z3bNm4GftQLOE7 wd8yqnxg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHi7H-0000000Fi4c-3dlH; Wed, 21 May 2025 12:00:11 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHi4G-0000000FhXB-0Nk1; Wed, 21 May 2025 11:57:05 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB58D1515; Wed, 21 May 2025 04:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.64.80] (unknown [10.57.64.80]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 354D23F5A1; Wed, 21 May 2025 04:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e7cb553-be71-4403-bc25-64457ec3e3d4@arm.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:57:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency To: Ulf Hansson , Heiko Stuebner Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <6f0a38e596c0727d0de13a29c9224f71bc7d30f1.1747760015.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <2393836.usQuhbGJ8B@phil> From: Robin Murphy Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250521_045704_169813_E66D424D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025-05-21 12:41 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 20:38, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >> >> Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2025, 19:10:17 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Robin Murphy: >>> Most 32-bit Rockchip platforms do not use PSCI, so having to select >>> ARM_PSCI to satisfy a dependency chain to retain working power domain >>> support is a bit weird and non-obvious. Now that the offending SMCCC API >>> is properly stubbed out for optional usage, we can relax this again. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner >> >> Of course this needs patch1 of this series to get applied >> first. >> >> I think for bisectability, doing this directly in patch1 might >> be less dangerous though? >> > > If it helps, I can pick both patches via my pmdomain tree, to make > sure patch1 really gets applied prior to patch2. Perhaps I should have been less lazy and written a brief cover letter, but indeed, given the dependency my hope was for these to both go together through the same tree - it's just an open question of which tree that should be :) Cheers, Robin. > Mark, Sudeep, Lorenzo do you see any problems with this? > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe