From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftest/arm64: Add MTE test config fragment
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:38:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ea35531-7d69-4c57-af16-e887e852735c@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aogSkJxWf9QndjuE@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 09:55:44AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 04:33:26PM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > +CONFIG_SYSFS=y
> > +CONFIG_TMPFS=y
> These are all covered by defconfig. Are these fragments still necessary?
> Or are they supposed to work on custom configs? If the latter EXPERT may
> be set, hence the PROC_SYSCTL above. You probably also need SHMEM.
In theory, yes since people might not run defconfig and it's supposed to
show what's needed for the tests. In practice people don't usually
bother, especially not for things like those which are going to be on in
any reasonable config.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 15:33 [PATCH 0/4] selftest/arm64: Fix MTE test setup and TAP reporting Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftest/arm64: Print TAP header Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftest/arm64: Treat KSM merge_across_nodes as optional Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 16:09 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-21 10:57 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftest/arm64: Fix MTE prctl TAP plan Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftest/arm64: Add MTE test config fragment Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 15:38 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-20 15:42 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-20 16:42 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-21 8:01 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 8:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-21 10:43 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 11:38 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ea35531-7d69-4c57-af16-e887e852735c@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox