linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch v2 3/3] arm: omap4: support pmu
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:13:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ffdf40ec6b200ebafe165d4008d0297@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299063420-22203-4-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>

Tom,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-
> arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
> tom.leiming at gmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 4:27 PM
> To: linux at arm.linux.org.uk
> Cc: Woodruff Richard; Tony Lindgren; Ming Lei; will.deacon at arm.com;
> linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: [patch v2 3/3] arm: omap4: support pmu
>
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
>
> This patch supports pmu irq routed from CTI, so
> make pmu/perf working on OMAP4.
>
> The idea is from Woodruff Richard in the disscussion
> about "Oprofile on Pandaboard / Omap4" on
> pandaboard at googlegroups.com.
>
> Cc: Woodruff Richard <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> ---
Few comments.

>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/dbg44xx.h |   18 +++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c |   83
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/dbg44xx.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dbg44xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/dbg44xx.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e447ad5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dbg44xx.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/*
> + * OMAP44xx on-chip debug support
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * XXX This file needs to be updated to align on one of "OMAP4",
> "OMAP44XX",
> + *     or "OMAP4430".
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP2_DBG44XX_H
> +#define __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP2_DBG44XX_H
> +
> +#define OMAP44XX_CTI0_BASE		0x54148000
> +#define OMAP44XX_CTI1_BASE		0x54149000
> +
> +#endif
You don't need this file. Move this base addresses to
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap44xx.h

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/devices.c
> index d216976..bae02d5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
>  #include <asm/pmu.h>
> +#include <asm/cti.h>
>
>  #include <plat/tc.h>
>  #include <plat/board.h>
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
>
>  #include "mux.h"
>  #include "control.h"
> +#include "dbg44xx.h"
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_OMAP2) ||
> defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_OMAP2_MODULE)
>
> @@ -322,20 +324,95 @@ static struct resource omap3_pmu_resource = {
>  	.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>  };
>
> +static struct resource omap4_pmu_resource[] = {
> +	{
> +		.start	= OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0,
> +		.end	= OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0,
> +		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.start	= OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1,
> +		.end	= OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1,
> +		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> +	}
> +};
> +
>  static struct platform_device omap_pmu_device = {
>  	.name		= "arm-pmu",
>  	.id		= ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU,
>  	.num_resources	= 1,
>  };
>
> +static struct arm_pmu_platdata omap4_pmu_data;
> +static struct cti omap4_cti[2];
> +
> +static void omap4_enable_cti(int irq)
> +{
> +	if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0)
> +		cti_enable(&omap4_cti[0]);
> +	else if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1)
> +		cti_enable(&omap4_cti[1]);
> +}
> +
> +static void omap4_disable_cti(int irq)
> +{
> +	if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0)
> +		cti_disable(&omap4_cti[0]);
> +	else if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1)
> +		cti_disable(&omap4_cti[1]);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t omap4_pmu_handler(int irq, void *dev,
> irq_handler_t handler)
> +{
> +	if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0)
> +		cti_irq_ack(&omap4_cti[0]);
> +	else if (irq == OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1)
> +		cti_irq_ack(&omap4_cti[1]);
> +
> +	return handler(irq, dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void omap4_configure_pmu_irq(void)
> +{
> +	void *base0;
> +	void *base1;
s/ void *base/ void __iomem *base
> +
> +	base0 = ioremap(OMAP44XX_CTI0_BASE, 4096);
s/4096/SZ_4K
> +	base1 = ioremap(OMAP44XX_CTI1_BASE, 4096);
> +	if (!base0 && !base1) {
> +		pr_err("ioremap for omap4 CTI failed\n");
s/omap4/OMAP4
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*configure CTI0 for pmu irq routing*/
> +	cti_init(&omap4_cti[0], base0, OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI0, 6);
> +	cti_unlock(&omap4_cti[0]);
> +	cti_map_trigger(&omap4_cti[0], 1, 6, 2);
> +
> +	/*configure CTI1 for pmu irq routing*/
> +	cti_init(&omap4_cti[1], base1, OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1, 6);
> +	cti_unlock(&omap4_cti[1]);
> +	cti_map_trigger(&omap4_cti[1], 1, 6, 2);
> +
> +	omap4_pmu_data.handle_irq = omap4_pmu_handler;
> +	omap4_pmu_data.enable_irq = omap4_enable_cti;
> +	omap4_pmu_data.disable_irq = omap4_disable_cti;
> +}
> +
>  static void omap_init_pmu(void)
>  {
> -	if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> +	if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
>  		omap_pmu_device.resource = &omap2_pmu_resource;
> -	else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
> +	} else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
>  		omap_pmu_device.resource = &omap3_pmu_resource;
> -	else
> +	} else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> +		omap_pmu_device.resource = omap4_pmu_resource;
> +		omap_pmu_device.num_resources = 2;
> +		omap_pmu_device.dev.platform_data = &omap4_pmu_data;
> +		omap4_configure_pmu_irq();
> +	} else {
>  		return;
> +	}
>
>  	platform_device_register(&omap_pmu_device);
>  }
> --
> 1.7.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02 10:56 [patch v2 0/3] arm: pmu: support pmu/perf on OMAP4 tom.leiming at gmail.com
2011-03-02 10:56 ` [patch v2 1/3] arm: introduce cross trigger interface helpers tom.leiming at gmail.com
2011-03-02 10:56 ` [patch v2 2/3] arm: pmu: allow platform specifc irq enable/disable handling tom.leiming at gmail.com
2011-03-02 12:10   ` Will Deacon
     [not found]   ` <-3190832915456449126@unknownmsgid>
2011-03-02 14:35     ` Ming Lei
2011-03-02 15:46       ` Will Deacon
2011-03-02 10:57 ` [patch v2 3/3] arm: omap4: support pmu tom.leiming at gmail.com
2011-03-02 12:43   ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ffdf40ec6b200ebafe165d4008d0297@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).