From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: julien.grall@arm.com (Julien Grall)
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:53:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/41] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer
 save/restore from VHE switch
In-Reply-To: <20180112120747.27999-18-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
References: <20180112120747.27999-1-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
 <20180112120747.27999-18-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20074994-caac-2be0-6eaa-83115c616756@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Christoffer,

On 01/12/2018 12:07 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The VHE switch function calls __timer_enable_traps and
> __timer_disable_traps which don't do anything on VHE systems.
> Therefore, simply remove these calls from the VHE switch function and
> make the functions non-conditional as they are now only called from the
> non-VHE switch path.
> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c |  2 --
>   virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 9aadef6966bf..6175fcb33ed2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	__activate_vm(vcpu->kvm);
>   
>   	__vgic_restore_state(vcpu);
> -	__timer_enable_traps(vcpu);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * We must restore the 32-bit state before the sysregs, thanks
> @@ -373,7 +372,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   	__sysreg_save_guest_state(guest_ctxt);
>   	__sysreg32_save_state(vcpu);
> -	__timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
>   	__vgic_save_state(vcpu);
>   
>   	__deactivate_traps(vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
> index f24404b3c8df..77754a62eb0c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c
> @@ -27,34 +27,34 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u32 cntvoff_low, u32 cntvoff_high)
>   	write_sysreg(cntvoff, cntvoff_el2);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Should only be called on non-VHE systems.
> + * VHE systems use EL2 timers and configure EL1 timers in kvm_timer_init_vhe().
> + */
>   void __hyp_text __timer_disable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Would it be worth to suffix the function with nvhe? So it would be clear 
that it should not be called for VHE system?

>   {
> -	/*
> -	 * We don't need to do this for VHE since the host kernel runs in EL2
> -	 * with HCR_EL2.TGE ==1, which makes those bits have no impact.
> -	 */
> -	if (!has_vhe()) {
> -		u64 val;
> +	u64 val;
>   
> -		/* Allow physical timer/counter access for the host */
> -		val = read_sysreg(cnthctl_el2);
> -		val |= CNTHCTL_EL1PCTEN | CNTHCTL_EL1PCEN;
> -		write_sysreg(val, cnthctl_el2);
> -	}
> +	/* Allow physical timer/counter access for the host */
> +	val = read_sysreg(cnthctl_el2);
> +	val |= CNTHCTL_EL1PCTEN | CNTHCTL_EL1PCEN;
> +	write_sysreg(val, cnthctl_el2);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Should only be called on non-VHE systems.
> + * VHE systems use EL2 timers and configure EL1 timers in kvm_timer_init_vhe().
> + */
>   void __hyp_text __timer_enable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Same here.

>   {
> -	if (!has_vhe()) {
> -		u64 val;
> +	u64 val;
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * Disallow physical timer access for the guest
> -		 * Physical counter access is allowed
> -		 */
> -		val = read_sysreg(cnthctl_el2);
> -		val &= ~CNTHCTL_EL1PCEN;
> -		val |= CNTHCTL_EL1PCTEN;
> -		write_sysreg(val, cnthctl_el2);
> -	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Disallow physical timer access for the guest
> +	 * Physical counter access is allowed
> +	 */
> +	val = read_sysreg(cnthctl_el2);
> +	val &= ~CNTHCTL_EL1PCEN;
> +	val |= CNTHCTL_EL1PCTEN;
> +	write_sysreg(val, cnthctl_el2);
>   }
> 

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall