From: daniel@caiaq.de (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:09:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910130959.GY9410@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909101459370.4458@axis700.grange>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:05:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
> > I agree, and it would be even better to only set that field in case the
> > driver has actually been probed (and not just enabled in the kernel
> > config). But I see no clean way to do that - the gcu driver has no
> > access to the framebuffer driver and its data structs either.
>
> Yeah, that doesn't look pretty. Maybe add a field to struct
> pxafb_mach_info? You can put its assignment in respective platform data
> instances under an #ifdef - that's more acceptable, IMHO. Of course, it is
> still worse than beeing able to switch this at run-time. But you could
> trick by setting that field at run-time if acceleration is available,
> provided you have that info before pxafb initialises. Also consider, there
> might be more PXA SoCs in the future using pxafb and providing hardware
> acceleration.
Jep, that's a good idea. Will send a new patch for that later.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 11:46 What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window Eric Miao
2009-09-10 11:54 ` Daniel Mack
2009-09-10 12:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-10 12:23 ` Eric Miao
2009-09-10 12:32 ` Daniel Mack
2009-09-10 12:35 ` Eric Miao
2009-09-10 12:44 ` Daniel Mack
2009-09-10 13:05 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-10 13:09 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2009-09-14 11:03 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-14 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-15 6:30 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-15 6:50 ` Eric Miao
2009-09-15 7:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-15 7:55 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-18 6:43 ` Matej Kenda
2009-09-18 6:47 ` Eric Miao
2009-09-18 7:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-21 19:19 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-09-21 20:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-21 20:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-30 12:09 ` arm tree in broken state (was Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window) Pavel Machek
2009-09-30 12:16 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910130959.GY9410@buzzloop.caiaq.de \
--to=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).