From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:14:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] S3C I2S: lrsync function made to work with IRQs disabled. In-Reply-To: <1253008957-10569-1-git-send-email-jassi.brar@samsung.com> References: <1253008957-10569-1-git-send-email-jassi.brar@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20090916001439.GD24720@trinity.fluff.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:02:37PM +0900, Jassi wrote: > s3c2412_snd_lrsync() maybe reached with IRQs disabled and if LRCLK > is dead due to improper initialization of CPU or CODEC, the system > gets stuck in the loop because jiffies may never get updated. > Implemented counter based wait mechanism for atleast the same > timeout period. > > Signed-Off-by: Jassi > --- > sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c b/sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c > index aa7af0b..8865bc7 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c > +++ b/sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c > @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ static void s3c2412_snd_rxctrl(struct s3c_i2sv2_info *i2s, int on) > pr_debug("%s: IIS: CON=%x MOD=%x FIC=%x\n", __func__, con, mod, fic); > } > > +#define msecs_to_loops(t) (loops_per_jiffy / 1000 * HZ * t) > + > /* > * Wait for the LR signal to allow synchronisation to the L/R clock > * from the codec. May only be needed for slave mode. > @@ -237,19 +239,21 @@ static void s3c2412_snd_rxctrl(struct s3c_i2sv2_info *i2s, int on) > static int s3c2412_snd_lrsync(struct s3c_i2sv2_info *i2s) > { > u32 iiscon; > - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5); > + unsigned long loops = msecs_to_loops(5); > > pr_debug("Entered %s\n", __func__); > > - while (1) { > + while (--loops) { > iiscon = readl(i2s->regs + S3C2412_IISCON); > if (iiscon & S3C2412_IISCON_LRINDEX) > break; > > - if (timeout < jiffies) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timeout\n", __func__); > - return -ETIMEDOUT; > - } > + cpu_relax(); I don't think cpu_relax() gives a defined 'timeout' length, thus this loop is of a very indeterminate length of timeout. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.