From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:52:21 +0100 Subject: [RFC] ptrace: system call number interpretation during PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL request handling In-Reply-To: References: <484047C3.4090509@gmail.com> <20080601083036.GD5818@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20090917205221.GC12766@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:41:43PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > > wrote: > >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:30:27PM +0300, Volodymyr G. Lukiianyk wrote: > >>> I've encountered a problem while running strace on the kernel with > >>> CONFIG_AEABI not set. This problem can be worked around in userspace, > >>> but it looks like the correct place for a fix is the kernel. > >> > >> I'm really nervous about this. ?I need to check what my own strace > >> patches do - and if they don't suffer from this problem I'd say that > >> the bug lies in userspace. > > > > Any results? Do we need to workaround it in user space or it will be > > fixed in kernel? > > Russell? I've not really been around much the last three days. What was the issue again?