From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:29:18 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] s3c2410_udc: 2440 dual packet workaround In-Reply-To: <164376.11955.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com> References: <164376.11955.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200909232230.03982.anarsoul@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? ????????? ?? 23 ???????? 2009 22:20:05 ????? David Anders ???????: > Vasily, > > i have tried this patch on a number of S3C2440 based systems and found that > this patch is not a completely effective solution. if the purpose is to > get a solution even if it is an incomplete one, then i'd be ok with this > patch, however, i'm not keen on accepting a patch into the main tree with > the knowledge that it isn't 100% effective. Hi, Dave s3c2410_udc driver is almost useless (at least it's very inconvenient) on s3c244x machines without this patch. I think it's much better to have incomplete solution than broken driver. Btw, I can resend patchset without this patch if maintainer of this driver thinks that accepting this patch is bad idea. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: