From: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] force dcache flush if dcache_dirty bit set
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012170312.GB9453@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910121634170.7327@sister.anvils>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sorry to muddy the waters on this, if you and Dave are sure that
> you have the right fix, down in your architectures, and that fix
> isn't going to hurt your performance significantly.
If I look at the issue from this point of view:
- we are using PG_arch_1 to delay cache handling for the page
- if PG_arch_1 is set on a page, we set it explicitly because we
didn't do some flushing between the allocation of the page and
mapping it into userspace
- if a page with PG_arch_1 set ever gets to userspace, this can
only be because we did the lazy flushing thing
I don't see that there should have been any bearing on whether a page
has a mapping or not when we get to update_mmu_cache. The issue here
is that > if PG_arch_1 is set on a page, then we didn't flush it at
the time when we believed it was appropriate to do so. <
Tell me I'm wrong (having only just sent it to Linus...)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-12 8:50 [PATCH] [ARM] force dcache flush if dcache_dirty bit set Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12 9:37 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 10:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12 10:16 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 16:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-12 17:03 ` Russell King [this message]
2009-10-12 17:12 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12 18:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 21:48 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-13 2:07 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-14 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-15 11:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-12 10:28 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12 11:16 ` Nitin Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091012170312.GB9453@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).