linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] force dcache flush if dcache_dirty bit set
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:07:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013020752.GB5736@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091012170312.GB9453@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:03:12PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Sorry to muddy the waters on this, if you and Dave are sure that
> > you have the right fix, down in your architectures, and that fix
> > isn't going to hurt your performance significantly.
> 
> If I look at the issue from this point of view:
> 
> - we are using PG_arch_1 to delay cache handling for the page
> 
> - if PG_arch_1 is set on a page, we set it explicitly because we
>   didn't do some flushing between the allocation of the page and
>   mapping it into userspace
> 
> - if a page with PG_arch_1 set ever gets to userspace, this can
>   only be because we did the lazy flushing thing
> 
> I don't see that there should have been any bearing on whether a page
> has a mapping or not when we get to update_mmu_cache.  The issue here
> is that > if PG_arch_1 is set on a page, then we didn't flush it at
> the time when we believed it was appropriate to do so. <
> 
> Tell me I'm wrong (having only just sent it to Linus...)
> 
Having looked at the ARM fix, in the !mapping case do you not need the
I-cache flush on vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC? Or is the presumption that
flush_icache_page()-type action doesn't need to be undertaken by
flush_dcache_page()/update_mmu_cache() when there is no page_mapping()?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-12  8:50 [PATCH] [ARM] force dcache flush if dcache_dirty bit set Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12  9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12  9:37   ` David Miller
2009-10-12 10:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12 10:16       ` David Miller
2009-10-12 16:09       ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-12 17:03         ` Russell King
2009-10-12 17:12           ` Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12 18:06           ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 21:48             ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-13  2:07           ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-10-14 17:10             ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-15 11:59               ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-12 10:28   ` Nitin Gupta
2009-10-12 11:08     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-12 11:16       ` Nitin Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091013020752.GB5736@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).