From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: baruch@tkos.co.il (Baruch Siach) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:53:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 16/16] i2c-designware: Add I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_* bits In-Reply-To: <4AD3EBDD.50105@necel.com> References: <4AD3E974.8080200@necel.com> <4AD3EBDD.50105@necel.com> Message-ID: <20091014185327.GD11789@tarshish> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Shinya, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: > This will ease our testing a bit with i2c-tools. Note that DW I2C core > doesn't support I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK, as it's not capable of slave- > addressing-only I2C transactions. Is this supposed to be applied to mainline? baruch > > Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c > index 6f85e28..80c8b8a 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c > @@ -529,7 +529,14 @@ done: > > static u32 i2c_dw_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > { > - return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR; > + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | > + I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_2; > } > > static u32 i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > -- > 1.6.5 > -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -