From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/10] PCMCIA soc_common re-factorization
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:18:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091027231849.GE22412@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <925a8da0d92cdf1f37aaef988fcc63bf9744576e.1256684685.git.rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This is a re-post of the previous patch series, but rebased forward
earlier on this month. Review comments would be nice to have, or
alternatively acks.
Lastly, is there an active PCMCIA maintainer who should take these?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 23:11 [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: provide single socket add/remove functionality Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket removal down to SoC specific support Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket probe down into " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: wrap soc_pcmcia_socket to contain sa1111 specific data Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: remove duplicated initializers Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: constify soc_pcmcia_socket ops member Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: remove 'dev' member from soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] PCMCIA: ss: allow PCI IRQs > 255 Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] PCMCIA: stop duplicating pci_irq in soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-04 16:27 ` [PATCH] pcmcia: Fix additional platforms after removal of skt->irq in 66024db57d5b9011e274b314affad68f370c0d6f Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2009-10-27 23:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2009-10-27 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] PCMCIA soc_common re-factorization Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-28 8:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-10-28 21:25 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-29 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 17:21 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-04 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 17:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 9:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 11:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 11:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091027231849.GE22412@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).