From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:47:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 08/12] ARM: S3C: Add info for supporting circular DMA buffers In-Reply-To: <20091028123944.GB23925@sirena.org.uk> References: <1256732153-22027-1-git-send-email-ben-linux@fluff.org> <1256732153-22027-8-git-send-email-ben-linux@fluff.org> <20091028123944.GB23925@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20091028124749.GD31509@trinity.fluff.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:39:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:15:49PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: > > The S3C64XX DMA implementation will work a lot better with the ability > > to enqueue circular buffers as the hardware can do it's own linked-list > > management. > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > If Samsung are going to be doing their upstreaming stuff it may make > sense to merge this via ASoC since I anticipate some changes there, but > on the other hand that seems to have ground to a halt and the merge may > well go smoothly anyway. My standard answer here would be putting the > patch on a branch by itself so if there are any issues it can be merged > into both trees to avoid the merge issues. I was pushing this up via my tree, it touches both the core and ASoC code so decided to merge myself and copy-you. On the whole Samsung merging, there is still work in progress there so we will see what is going to happen. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.