From: linux@dominikbrodowski.net (Dominik Brodowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/10] PCMCIA soc_common re-factorization
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091028212534.GA31361@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091027231849.GE22412@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:18:49PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> This is a re-post of the previous patch series, but rebased forward
> earlier on this month. Review comments would be nice to have, or
> alternatively acks.
Acked-by / Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> .
> Lastly, is there an active PCMCIA maintainer who should take these?
Do you have a git tree to pull from, or shall I apply each patch locally?
Alternatively, you're free to push it upstream yourself; as the PCMCIA core
is only touched in one (albeit _very_ useful) line.
Best,
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 23:11 [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: provide single socket add/remove functionality Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket removal down to SoC specific support Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket probe down into " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: wrap soc_pcmcia_socket to contain sa1111 specific data Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: remove duplicated initializers Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: constify soc_pcmcia_socket ops member Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: remove 'dev' member from soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] PCMCIA: ss: allow PCI IRQs > 255 Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] PCMCIA: stop duplicating pci_irq in soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-04 16:27 ` [PATCH] pcmcia: Fix additional platforms after removal of skt->irq in 66024db57d5b9011e274b314affad68f370c0d6f Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2009-10-27 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] PCMCIA soc_common re-factorization Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-28 8:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-10-28 21:25 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2009-10-29 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 17:21 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-04 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 17:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 9:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 11:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 11:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091028212534.GA31361@comet.dominikbrodowski.net \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).