From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel@caiaq.de (Daniel Mack) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:29:09 +0100 Subject: Possible suspend/resume regression in .32-rc? In-Reply-To: <771cded00911020122o3bb5cc96q957c8be1ce7cae46@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091031013427.GL14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <20091101205449.GT14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <20091101213343.GA31345@elf.ucw.cz> <20091101220341.GA16698@elf.ucw.cz> <771cded00911020122o3bb5cc96q957c8be1ce7cae46@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091102092909.GW14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:22:30AM -0400, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > >> > Ok, got it. The culprit is commit d2c37068 ("[ARM] pxa: initialize > >> > default interrupt priority and use ICHP for IRQ handling"). Reverting it > >> > make suspend/resume work again on my board. > >> > > >> > Haojian, Eric, could you have a look at this? > >> > >> Okay, patch is this one: I'll test reverting it shortly. > >> > >> commit d2c37068429b29d6549cf3486fc84b836689e122 > >> Author: Haojian Zhuang > >> Date: ? Wed Aug 19 19:49:31 2009 +0800 > >> > >> ? ? [ARM] pxa: initialize default interrupt priority and use ICHP for IRQ handling > >> > >> ? ? Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang > >> ? ? Signed-off-by: Eric Miao > > > > And yes, reverting it _does_ fix suspend on spitz. > > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Pavel > > Em, it's not caused by the IRQ patch. > > The kernel is blocked in resume path. When console is resumed, IRQ is > already disabled and system is blocked. Actually, IRQ shouldn't be > disabled at here. Up to now, I only find which patch will cause this > issue. But I can't find the best solution on it. The patch with issue > is pasted in below. > > So this issue is only occused when console suspend is enabled. If you > enable no_console_suspend in command, you won't meet this issue. It > seems that it's caused by removing termios setting in > uart_resume_port() in the below patch. If I add these code back, the > issue doesn't occur any more. Well no, not confirmed. I tested with no_console_suspend, and it still hit me. And without too, btw. Daniel