From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Using statically allocated memory for platform_data.
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:39:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091102103940.GA25282@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102112316.16163f6a.ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:23:16AM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noted that in some mfd drivers (drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c and
> drivers/mfd/da903x.c) there is code like this:
>
> static int __devinit pcap_add_subdev(struct pcap_chip *pcap,
> struct pcap_subdev *subdev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
>
> pdev = platform_device_alloc(subdev->name, subdev->id);
> pdev->dev.parent = &pcap->spi->dev;
> pdev->dev.platform_data = subdev->platform_data;
>
> return platform_device_add(pdev);
> }
>
> Note the _direct_assignment_ of platform data; then in board init code
> there are often global struct pointers passed as subdev platform data,
> see arch/arm/mach-pxa/em-x270.c::em_x270_da9030_subdevs for instance.
>
> In these cases, whenever the subdev platform device is unregistered,
> the call to platform_device_release() tries to kfree the platform data,
> and being it statically allocated memory this triggers a bug from SLAB:
> kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:521!
> In my case this prevented proper device poweroff.
>
> The question: should these mfd drivers use platform_device_add_data()
> which allocates dynamic memory for *a copy* of platform data? Is this
> simple solution acceptable even if there will be more memory used?
If you move the original data lives in .init there is no duplication.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 10:23 Using statically allocated memory for platform_data Antonio Ospite
2009-11-02 10:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2009-11-02 14:51 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-02 15:00 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-02 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 15:25 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-02 15:52 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-02 15:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 16:28 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-02 16:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 16:47 ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-03 17:31 ` Antonio Ospite
2009-11-08 21:24 ` Antonio Ospite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091102103940.GA25282@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).