From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:16:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] at91: support for eco920 In-Reply-To: References: <20091021084826.GA29667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1256115527-20635-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20091101203240.GA18116@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20091102201626.GA25272@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Andrew Victor wrote: > > Is this patch OK now, should I sent to the patch system even if > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD pointed out the defconfig stuff isn't > > optimal? > > Fine with me. > Acked-by: Andrew Victor Russell, is this enough to send it to the patch system? Best regards and thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |