From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] gta02: set pcf50633 charger_reference_current_ma
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:26:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113182621.GA1368@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091112215947.GB12308@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu 2009-11-12 21:59:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-11-11 18:31:43, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:48:44PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Ben, please give us an advice on how to proceed with this rather
> > > > trivial patch. Anton doesn't merge the other patches from this series
> > > > because we do not know via which tree to merge this particular patch.
> > >
> > > Paul, I'll just merge the whole patch set but skip this particular
> > > patch.
> >
> > Feel free to merge that patch, too. It is clearly related to the
> > other stuff, and Russell being totally unresponsive should not be
> > reason to block patches.
> >
> > He is the maintainer, he was cc-ed, and at this point it is quite
> > clear that he does not care.
>
> Err, WTF? How do you come to the conclusion that I'm somehow related
> to Samsung stuff, or GTA03 stuff? Oh, that's right, you don't let facts
> get in the way of blaming me for something.
Ok, you are right, Ben is listed as Samsung maintainer. Accept my
apologies. The rest stands: Anton should just take the patch, because
maintainer does not care.
Actually, given that Ben is unresponsive, it should be either you or
Anton taking the patch; so if you prefer, you can take it.
> I've been ignoring this because as far as I can see, it's got nothing
> to do with me, and therefore its pointless me acking it.
>
> Really Pavel, just take a moment to get your facts straight before you
> start blaming people.
Now, you still are arm maintainer, and that includes arch-msm. There's
nice series in your inbox for week+ -- HTC Dream support. There's also
Daniel Walker who is willing to maintain the architecture. Can we get
the patches applied (or some other decision?). Pavel
-- (english)
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1257369899-325-1-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1257369899-325-2-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com>
2009-11-04 21:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] gta02: set pcf50633 charger_reference_current_ma Paul Fertser
2009-11-11 13:48 ` Paul Fertser
2009-11-11 15:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-12 7:40 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-12 21:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-13 18:26 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-11-16 1:00 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113182621.GA1368@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).