From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:38:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: MX3: add SPI devices for mx31lite
In-Reply-To: <20091118154256.GI14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
References: <1258551702-8631-1-git-send-email-daniel@caiaq.de>
	<1258551702-8631-2-git-send-email-daniel@caiaq.de>
	<1258551702-8631-3-git-send-email-daniel@caiaq.de>
	<20091118153708.GN30179@pengutronix.de>
	<20091118154256.GI14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Message-ID: <20091119083825.GO30179@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:42:56PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:41:40PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >  /*
> > > + * SPI
> > > + *
> > > + * The MX13783 is hard-wired on the module, hence the corresponding
> > > + * bus is registered here and not in the board code, in contrast to
> > > + * the other SPI bus.
> > > + */
> > 
> > 
> > The mc13783 bus is registered in the -db file, and not here. I think you
> > mixed something up here.
> 
> Hmm, no, that actually correct. The problem is that all devices on the
> SPI bus have to be registered in one block via spi_register_board_info,

Looking at the SPI code I see no reason why it shouldn't be possible to call
spi_register_board_info multiple times.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |