From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mika.westerberg@iki.fi (Mika Westerberg) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:00:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ep93xx: implemented watchdog timer driver for TS-72xx SBCs In-Reply-To: <20091204114950.GC993@chipmunk> References: <3518ebf38d7a0038262cd20beb5283198e99e22e.1259866661.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi> <5r4nu6-pia.ln1@chipmunk.wormnet.eu> <20091204113358.GE5626@gw.healthdatacare.com> <20091204114507.GB993@chipmunk> <20091204114950.GC993@chipmunk> Message-ID: <20091204120014.GF5626@gw.healthdatacare.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:49:50AM +0000, Alexander Clouter wrote: > Hi, > > * Alexander Clouter [2009-12-04 11:45:07+0000]: > > > > * Mika Westerberg [2009-12-04 13:33:58+0200]: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:28:21AM +0000, Alexander Clouter wrote: > > > > > > > ....and also on the TS-78XX boards. Although my TS-7800 board is being > > > > neglected at the moment it would be great if you could replace > > > > everywhere you put ts72xx with ts7xxx and such. Means when I add the > > > > platform hooks for the TS-78xx I do not have to submit a patch that is a > > > > rather intrusive rename/relabelling one. > > > > > > Is the TS-7800 watchdog timer similar than the ones in TS-72xx SBCs? I couldn't > > > find any documentation about that in TS web site. If this is the case then > > > I would be more than happy to do this stuff. > > > > > TS made the FPGA/AVR code/hardware more or less identical to retain > > backwards compatibility. Obviously the platform specific resource maps > > might be a little different but that is all. The NAND, for example, is > > also identical on both, the TS-7800 however adds a hardware ECC and > > option to allow DMA transfers. > > > > The details are only really documented in the source code of a tool TS > > provide: > > > > http://svn.lee.org/swarm/trunk/spu/src/dillo7800/root/ts7800ctl.c > > > Hmmmm, on closer reinspection, the AVR hides behind an I2C bus so > probably worth forgetting the renaming suggestion. OK. Thanks for the information. I'll keep it as ts72xx for now. MW