From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Remove suspend/resume functionality, add dynamic clocking
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:02:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091206210225.GA20887@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091206084731.GE2766@ucw.cz>
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:47:31AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove suspend/resume functionality, add dynamic
> > > clocking
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > can you please add something like "i2c-pnx: " to the subject?
> > > (Actually it's a great strategy *not* to put it into the Subject. This
> > > way it attracts far more attention :-)
> > >
> >
> > Good point!
> >
> > > > Remove suspend/resume functionality, I2C driver gates clock on
> > > > only when an I2C transaction is in progress
> > > What happens when the machine suspends while a transfer is in progress?
> > > (This might be a problem that already existed before.) If this is
> > > really a problem the easiest "fix" is to let the suspend callback return
> > > -EBUSY in this case.
> >
> > The suspend callback is now removed. It's actually not needed with this
> > change. The I2C clocks will turn on prior to a transaction and then turn
> > off at the completion.
>
> Are you sure its unneeded? What if someone attempts to suspend the
> system when a transaction is running?
That's exactly my question. I think the machine will suspend and the
transaction fail. So no suspend callback isn't optimal, but maybe OK?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-06 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 21:23 [PATCH 1/1] Remove suspend/resume functionality, add dynamic clocking Kevin Wells
2009-11-26 9:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-26 10:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 17:02 ` Kevin Wells
2009-12-06 8:47 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-06 21:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2009-12-06 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-07 19:21 ` Kevin Wells
2009-12-15 10:36 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-30 23:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-01 18:25 ` Kevin Wells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091206210225.GA20887@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).